homeschoolmom Posted June 5, 2013 Posted June 5, 2013 BOOM! head shot! I think that was the cousin that she felt obligated to include in the wedding.
Papist Posted June 6, 2013 Author Posted June 6, 2013 I think that was the cousin that she felt obligated to include in the wedding. You sound bitter.
homeschoolmom Posted June 6, 2013 Posted June 6, 2013 You sound bitter. Maybe... but not because of any weddings I was or was not in... or about who was in my wedding a jillion years ago. (I don't have any cousins that I would recognize if I were to run into them on the street.)
Papist Posted June 6, 2013 Author Posted June 6, 2013 Maybe... but not because of any weddings I was or was not in... or about who was in my wedding a jillion years ago. (I don't have any cousins that I would recognize if I were to run into them on the street.) I am. I was obliged to invite my brother's sis-in-laws, whom I do not care for. I did. They accepted, but after I never got the RSVP and bugged my brother to ask them if they are. As you know, the price of the reception (that I paid for, but that is another thing) is based on number of people attending. They did not show. Must have been a chewing tobacco convention the same day. I have not heard from them since. That was 8.5 years ago.
homeschoolmom Posted June 6, 2013 Posted June 6, 2013 (edited) I am. I was obliged to invite my brother's sis-in-laws, whom I do not care for. I did. They accepted, but after I never got the RSVP and bugged my brother to ask them if they are. As you know, the price of the reception (that I paid for, but that is another thing) is based on number of people attending. They did not show. Must have been a chewing tobacco convention the same day. I have not heard from them since. That was 8.5 years ago. Oh yes... don't get me started.... :rolleyes: (Trying to convince my dd to (eventually) have a small wedding on our parish's lovely (and small) chapel.) Edited June 6, 2013 by homeschoolmom
Leonardo da vinci Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 I believe he did. Apparently what he did is even more effective than lying in making your pantaloons catch fire. :lol:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now