Jump to content
Join our Facebook Group ×
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Recommended Posts

The Master
Posted

I apologize if this question has come up again and again but... I am a teen philosopher by hobby and not profession. When I debate I like to have a solid definition of the words and phrases I use. When I hear pro-life, I assume that it means support of all kinds of human life. I am curious as to what opinions different people have about the definition of pro-life. My question is simply: What is included when you say pro-life? anti-abortion? anti-death penalty? anti-euthanasia? all of the above? Maybe anti- some kinds of these? Please tell me. I love to hear what people think.

 

Thanks!

Archaeology cat
Posted

I include all of those, as well as support of pregnant women and mothers and fathers.

FutureCarmeliteClaire
Posted

All of the above and anti-suicide as well.

Btw, welcome to the Phorum! ;)

Posted

what are the choices if your  pro-choice?

 

 

preciousawakening
Posted

The Pro-Life platform supports life from conception to natural death, so all of the above!

Chestertonian
Posted

People who refer to themselves as "pro-life" are often times pro-capital punishment. If you tell the average person that you're pro-life, I think they'd assume that you were referring to the issue of abortion exclusively. 

Posted

It's the great reactionary fight against women of insufficient sexual reluctance.  

Posted

It's the great reactionary fight against women of insufficient sexual reluctance.  

 

+ really bad luck.

Chestertonian
Posted (edited)

A word of advice to the OP: Don't waste your time debating the preciousness of human life with people who reject objective morality; it's a waste of time. There are enough "pro-choice" theists out there to keep you busy.

Edited by Chestertonian
Chestertonian
Posted

+ really bad luck.

 

The conceiving of a child is never "really bad luck."

Posted

A word of advice to the OP: Don't waste your time debating the preciousness of human life with people who reject objective morality; it's a waste of time. There are enough "pro-choice" theists out there to keep you busy.


I think that human life is extremely valuable.
CatholicsAreKewl
Posted

There are pro-life anti-theists as well. Christopher Hitchens was pro-life, though I'm not sure to what degree. He opposed abortion and the death penalty, but I don't know if he opposed suicide or euthanasia. 

Chestertonian
Posted (edited)

There are pro-life anti-theists as well. Christopher Hitchens was pro-life, though I'm not sure to what degree. He opposed abortion and the death penalty, but I don't know if he opposed suicide or euthanasia. 

 

He thought abortion was repulsive, but didn't think it should be illegal. Also, he was a major exception to the rule.
 

Edited by Chestertonian
Posted (edited)

I don't really care to have people who support neo-con foreign police and cutting social programs lecturing me on the preciousness of human life. Which is why the pro-life movement is suck a crock. A clump of cells with no capacity for independent life and no conceptualization of their own existence is not a human person. That becomes much more murky as those clumps if cells start to actually develop into something recognizably human.

Edited by Hasan
Posted

He thought abortion was repulsive, but didn't think it should be illegal. Also, he was a major exception to the rule.


Not really. His position is pretty close to mine and my position isn't unique at all. Step out of the echo chamber every now and then. It's lovely.
CatholicsAreKewl
Posted

Not really. His position is pretty close to mine and my position isn't unique at all. Step out of the echo chamber every now and then. It's lovely.

Don't hate on echo-chambers.

Posted

The conceiving of a child is never "really bad luck."

 

I meant from the perspective of a woman who doesn't want a child.

Posted

If only there were some practical way to largely mitigate this whole vast moral dilemma. Something that could ensure, to a high degree of accuracy, that a woman who did not want to become pregnant would not.

CatholicsAreKewl
Posted

If only there were some practical way to largely mitigate this whole vast moral dilemma. Something that could ensure, to a high degree of accuracy, that a woman who did not want to become pregnant would not.

Gay marriage. 

Posted

Precisely

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...