homeschoolmom Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhuturePriest Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 This is the weirdest thing I've ever heard of, and that's including otherkins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credo in Deum Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 I'm going to ask the hard hitting questions 'cause someone has to do it, and it might as well be me. Will there be oreos? Will they be double stuffed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriela Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 10 hours ago, Credo in Deum said: I'm going to ask the hard hitting questions 'cause someone has to do it, and it might as well be me. Will there be oreos? Will they be double stuffed? If there are, are you in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credo in Deum Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 31 minutes ago, Gabriela said: If there are, are you in? If they're double or mega stuffed then yes. If it not then it's an abomination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xSilverPhinx Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 On 6/18/2016 at 4:07 AM, Credo in Deum said: I'm going to ask the hard hitting questions 'cause someone has to do it, and it might as well be me. Will there be oreos? Will they be double stuffed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credo in Deum Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 1 hour ago, xSilverPhinx said: ... ..... ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amppax Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 On 6/18/2016 at 2:18 PM, Credo in Deum said: If they're double or mega stuffed then yes. If it not then it's an abomination. Abominations. Like shellfish and Hutterites? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papist Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franciscanheart Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 Someone please explain to me why this is a sin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credo in Deum Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 18 minutes ago, franciscanheart said: Someone please explain to me why this is a sin. Within marriage I do not see it as a sinful. Odd? Yes. Bizzare? Yes. I do not see this as moral behavior for a bf and gf, and there could be a sin in thinking such actions could have "magical" effects on your relationship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maggyie Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 20 minutes ago, franciscanheart said: Someone please explain to me why this is a sin. I changed my mind, I think it's sinful since they aren't married. Babies nurse for nutrition and comfort. Given that clearly she's not feeding him, that leaves comfort/gratification that he's getting from her body. It's an extremely intimate experience, it creates a bond that is pretty hard to break, just like sex. The lady correctly says "for that time, we become one." Red flag this should be done by people who have committed to each other for all time in marriage. Also, realistically I think it is a sexual thing. There's a chance it's not, but I think especially for the boyfriend it's probably part of a fantasy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franciscanheart Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 Okay, so within the context of marriage. Within the context of marriage, this is not off limits. If I remember correctly from my very young phatmass education, pretty much anything goes so long as you're married in the Church to the right person and the man finishes inside the woman -- regardless of whether or not the woman finishes. (Insert something about JPII saying it's kind for the man to ensure his woman has an orgasm.) So, technically, you can be as kinky as you want so long as the sperm is laid in its "appropriate" place. Please correct me if I am wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maggyie Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 No... That's my understanding too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dUSt Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 4 hours ago, franciscanheart said: Okay, so within the context of marriage. Within the context of marriage, this is not off limits. If I remember correctly from my very young phatmass education, pretty much anything goes so long as you're married in the Church to the right person and the man finishes inside the woman -- regardless of whether or not the woman finishes. (Insert something about JPII saying it's kind for the man to ensure his woman has an orgasm.) So, technically, you can be as kinky as you want so long as the sperm is laid in its "appropriate" place. Please correct me if I am wrong. You better not let @ironmonk see this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now