Okay, with's this I'm hearing about Ratzinger...

[Lil Red]

F.A., since you are new here, you may not realize that on this board we do not allow for Pope bashing or Catholic vs Catholic debate ("neo conservatives" vs. "traditional" - i'm putting that it quotes because i honestly think the labels are ridiculous)

people who do these things end up getting warned and then kicked off...so please be aware of that and edit your posts before a moderator does it for you.

[Thy Geekdom Come]

[quote name='F.A.' date='Nov 11 2004, 04:23 PM'] Please StColette if you truly want to be objective you should read both sides of the story. Here is what Robert Sungenis has to say about the Catholic Culture website.

[url="http://www.catholicintl.com/catholicissues/mirus1.htm"]Robert Sungenis[/url]

God Bless,
F.A. [/quote]
Hehe...F.A....nescis quod faceres...

[F.A.]

Umm since I am new at this (and lack what most people call "tact"). Could someone please point what parts I should modify. It would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
F.A.

PS. StColette I never meant this to be an attack on you, and if it sounded as such then I sincerly apologize. Hope you will forgive any wrong doing.

[Lil Red]

F.A., it's okay, i just thought i would tell you because you are new here and might not know the rules...

for example, stuff like:

[quote]The consecration has not been done and the Vatican hierarchy is trying to do everything to ignore the message of Fatima.[/quote]

is probably not in the best interest to post.

[F.A.]

Thanks, modified that bit. Does anything else look too aggressive?

Once again thanks for your help.

*edit* Now rereading all that I have written I don't think the moderators would be too happy with most of the stuff I have written. I should probably delete most of it and just present the links with a small text next to them. Then again I'm not sure. *edit*

*edit2* Snipped heaps more. If any moderator takes offense with anything I have written I would remove some more if necessary */edit2*

God Bless,
F.A.

Edited November 11, 2004 by F.A.

[Lil Red]

F.A. i sent you a private message, but disregard, because it looks a lot better...thank you so much!!! we like having new people here and we'd love for you to stick around. God bless. go to "Open Mic" and introduce yourself!

[F.A.]

I think I might, however at this stage sleep looks like a more important issue (its 5:08 AM here now).

Thanks,
F.A.

[Lil Red]

oh wow, yeah, go sleep and introduce yourself later! Have a good sleep!

[cmotherofpirl]

[quote name='CatholicCrusader' date='Nov 11 2004, 02:09 PM'] The Third Secret has not been revealed yet. And Ratzinger did say the same. Moreover, I think that it is at least fallibly taught that the last Pope will be the Anti-Christ, can someone from Apologetics possibly help me on that? If that is the case, then XIX, your idea that "the Church [read: Pope] becoming an apostate makes it an illogical notion to be Catholic" cannot stand, if I am correct on this point, which, as I said, I would appreciate any help from someone on that. [/quote]
Yes it has. Ratzinger did not say it was not revealed.
It is not taught that the last Pope will be the anti-Christ.

Get a copy of [i]Trial Tribulation and Triumph[/i] by Desmond Birch which is the definitive book on the last days, which we are NOT in.

[cmotherofpirl]

[quote name='CatholicforChrist' date='Nov 11 2004, 04:10 PM'] Sister Lucia, the only one left of the Fatima children, has said that the Third Secret has not been revealed and that Russia is not Consecrated to Our Lady. The International Fatima Rosary Crusade, founded and currently headed by Fr. Nicholas Gruner, has more information, which I have read. [/quote]
Wrong.
Father Gruner was suspended from his faculties, he is NOT a legitimate or CREDIBLE source.

[cmotherofpirl]

FA Welcome to Phatmass. Introduce yourself when you wake up.

We don't like to sites that diss the Church. If the Church says the secret was revealed , then it was.

XIX I think your question has been answered so this thread will be closed.