Genesis vs Evolution

[ironmonk]

[quote name='Iacobus' date='Nov 19 2004, 09:13 PM'] I disagree with you on Darwin's theory being wrong, but I shall assume you are either ignorant (which isn't bad) of the theory or reject it for some other theory (which, again, isn't bad).

[/quote]
Darwinism (his theory) is wrong. I am not ignorant. Nor do I expect you to be able to comprehend (which isn't bad) something so scietific and logical as the proof to Darwinism being a fallicy. I've already stated it in this thread.


Eve came from Adam... in Darwinism, that could not have happened.


God Bless,
ironmonk

[Theoketos]

[quote name='Balthazor' date='Nov 19 2004, 04:05 PM'] Iron,

Social Darwinism was the basis for descrimination and racism. Darwin did not think up social Darwinism. It was someone else who decided that some people are more evolved or better than others, it twists the theory of evolution to suite it's own needs. Much like people use isolated parts of the Bible to justify whatever action they want.

I am not correcting you mind you, I am just adding to your opening thought.

God Bless,
Balthazor [/quote]
Um...

Darwin did lament that the "aborginal races" were stronger because they did not have the medicines that the "white people" had, and thus thier race was becoming stronger, which is Ironic, because both he and his offspring were sickly.

[Iacobus]

[quote]
And if there was evolution, then something has to tell the organism to evolve. For example a light sensitive freckle cannot all the sudden turn into an eye... and there is no middle ground or transition period. Darwinism claims this.

Any animal's camoflage... proof that a higher being made them... animals are not smart enough to know to move into something that looks like them... such as a rattlesnake in leaves... a fish on the bottom of the floor of the sea.... the scorpion fish which looks like coral... etc...[/quote]

Max, both of those comments show a misunderstanding of Darwin's (and Wallece's) theory. Read up on it and than reply.

[Guest Aluigi]

can you have darwinism in which there are still two original human beings who were perfect humans and from which every single human being alive today came from (there can never be any man on earth that is not a son of adam or woman that's not a daughter of eve)

[ironmonk]

[quote name='Iacobus' date='Nov 20 2004, 12:30 AM']
Max, both of those comments show a misunderstanding of Darwin's (and Wallece's) theory. Read up on it and than reply. [/quote]
Wrong.

There is no way to develop irreducibly complex structures in a Darwinian way.

Read up on it, then come talk.


God Bless,
ironmonk