Sammy Blaze Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 Well I noticed that I'm quickly approaching 700 posts, and I'm always on phatmass.... so i thought to myself, I only talk to the rappers, artists and music lounge peeps So this is a get to know Sammy Blaze thread, hopefully this works haha ask away......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleflower+JMJ Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 sammy..................... will you marry me? :wub: :hearts: oh i should start with easy questions huh? okay.....um..... :thinking: i think i got one...... :ph34r: whats your favorite color? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krush2k2 Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 Yes Mr.Blaze-with the recent mantra of evolutionising common philosphy, I was wondering if you could articulate for me your understanding of global consumption of the unknown? Is it the dance with mystery that leads so many to edify and follow what they cant explain? Thank you sir for your time and answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleflower+JMJ Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 [quote name='Krush2k2' date='Jan 4 2005, 02:56 AM'] Yes Mr.Blaze-with the recent mantra of evolutionising common philosphy, I was wondering if you could articulate for me your understanding of global consumption of the unknown? Is it the dance with mystery that leads so many to edify and follow what they cant explain? Thank you sir for your time and answer [/quote] say what? we can start with hard questions? nobody told me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy Blaze Posted January 4, 2005 Author Share Posted January 4, 2005 [quote name='littleflower' date='JMJ+Jan 4 2005, 02:56 AM'] sammy..................... will you marry me? :wub: :hearts: oh i should start with easy questions huh? okay.....um..... :thinking: i think i got one...... :ph34r: whats your favorite color? [/quote] Question 1: Maybe..... Question 2: Brown or Orange Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy Blaze Posted January 4, 2005 Author Share Posted January 4, 2005 [quote name='Krush2k2' date='Jan 4 2005, 02:56 AM'] Yes Mr.Blaze-with the recent mantra of evolutionising common philosphy, I was wondering if you could articulate for me your understanding of global consumption of the unknown? Is it the dance with mystery that leads so many to edify and follow what they cant explain? Thank you sir for your time and answer [/quote] Krush, I believe the self-motivating drive within the human psyche to explore and cognitively express interest in the unknown, is the key. and/or 72 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleflower+JMJ Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 good answer!! good answer!!! :rotfl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krush2k2 Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 [quote name='Sammy Blaze' date='Jan 4 2005, 03:00 AM'] Krush, I believe the self-motivating drive within the human psyche to explore and cognitively express interest in the unknown, is the key. and/or 72 [/quote] Agreed. Yet, with the exception of the and/or 72 Theory, I'm assuming based on thorough research that a more cognitive aproach would without question, be 96, or 34. Have you looked into the common factor regarding the ommision of secular phsycosis, in the hybrid of retainment of the first cause? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy Blaze Posted January 4, 2005 Author Share Posted January 4, 2005 Krush, To suggest 96 or 34 is a hypothetical slap in the face to the fundamental structure of cognitive psycho-philosophy, regardles of the omission of secular psychosis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krush2k2 Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 (edited) [quote name='Sammy Blaze' date='Jan 4 2005, 03:06 AM'] Krush, To suggest 96 or 34 is a hypothetical slap in the face to the fundamental structure of cognitive psycho-philosophy, regardles of the omission of secular psychosis [/quote] Yes, but a slap in the face to modernists is a pat on the back for catalistic ventures into the ommision proccess. We must remember and/or 72 for what it 'was' which in every since of scientific evaluation-was failure. Perhaps 34 will bring to the table what 72 could never-and thats the accessible dimension needed for the retention of added intervals. Edited January 4, 2005 by Krush2k2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy Blaze Posted January 4, 2005 Author Share Posted January 4, 2005 [quote] Yes, but a slap in the face to modernists is a pat on the back for catalistic ventures into the ommision proccess. We must remember and/or 72 for what it 'was' which in every since of scientific evaluation-was failure. Perhaps 34 will bring to the table what 72 could never-and thats the accessible dimension needed for the retention of added intervals. [/quote] This is no place for debate Ryan, this is a place for serious Q & A's, and if the answer I provided (which is logically and reasonably true) is not up to par with your post-neo-reconstructional ideas on the omission process, I am sorry. Next question! ~S. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleflower+JMJ Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 are your right or left handed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krush2k2 Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 [quote name='Sammy Blaze' date='Jan 4 2005, 03:15 AM'] This is no place for debate Ryan, this is a place for serious Q & A's, and if the answer I provided (which is logically and reasonably true) is not up to par with your post-neo-reconstructional ideas on the omission process, I am sorry. Next question! ~S. [/quote] On a more complex note-do you like the Pope's hat better or his cane? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krush2k2 Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 ahh, the woes of the ommision proccess.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.R.D Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 intrestin topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now