james Posted January 22, 2005 Posted January 22, 2005 (edited) [b]Sanhedrin Rabbis Discuss Sublime, Procedural Issues [/b] 11:14 Jan 20, '05 / 10 Shevat 5765 The 71 rabbis seeking to fulfill the Biblical commandment of renewing the Sanhedrin continue to meet regularly, solidifying their organizational structure and establishing an agenda of topics. Their most recent meeting was this week, in which they discussed technical and procedural issues, topics for their agenda, and the Halakhic [Jewish legal] and other ramifications of [b]renewing the Passover sacrifice.[/b] [url="http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=75313"]http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=75313[/url] Edited January 22, 2005 by james
Catalyst Posted January 23, 2005 Posted January 23, 2005 when will they realise Christ was all the sacrifice they need.....
jezic Posted January 23, 2005 Posted January 23, 2005 they might not but the world is becoming a tinderbox. One spark and it begins.
crusader1234 Posted January 23, 2005 Posted January 23, 2005 I'm frankly really insulted by this post. I think that the Sanhedrin is a [i]great[/i] idea, considering thats basically what the Nation of Israel is all about. And as for your controversial title and bolded letters, do you even know what the Passover Sacrifice happens to be? Doubtful.
jezic Posted January 23, 2005 Posted January 23, 2005 [quote name='crusader1234' date='Jan 23 2005, 01:39 AM'] I'm frankly really insulted by this post. I think that the Sanhedrin is a [i]great[/i] idea, considering thats basically what the Nation of Israel is all about. And as for your controversial title and bolded letters, do you even know what the Passover Sacrifice happens to be? Doubtful. [/quote] by my post or the main one? very few people understand much. THis might seem like something little but waves in the middle of the ocean are also very small.
crusader1234 Posted January 23, 2005 Posted January 23, 2005 No, the main one. It is a big deal, and im my opinion, a good thing. What makes me mad is the fact that it says 'Blood Soon to flow at Temple Mount' and then goes on to make it seem as if Jews are crazy people that are going to renew [b]the passover sacrifice[/b]. The post conjures up thoughts that they're gonna be killing people - but the Passover Sacrifice was a very specific procedure of sacrificing a lamb. Its uneducated posts like James' that make me mad because they are misleading and totally unappropriate.
jezic Posted January 23, 2005 Posted January 23, 2005 i see now. I wouldn't think of it that way. But i see how some people might. The passover sacrifice has never stopped has it?
jezic Posted January 23, 2005 Posted January 23, 2005 define sacrifice otherwise what about the Mass today and the continuing eternal sacrifice of Christ?? That isn't void.
jezic Posted January 24, 2005 Posted January 24, 2005 I see then you must mean the ancient passover sacrifice. Did they quit doing that?? If they did, wow am i out of the loop. I thought it was a required feast forever for the Jewish people.
MichaelFilo Posted January 24, 2005 Posted January 24, 2005 80 AD Titus totally owns Jerusalem. No more temple. No more sacrafice. God bless, Mikey
jezic Posted January 24, 2005 Posted January 24, 2005 do not the people have their own sacrifice? They didn't have the temple in egypt when the first Passover occured.
james Posted January 26, 2005 Author Posted January 26, 2005 You are welcome to your opinion that the reestablishment of the Sanhedrin which condemned our Lord to death is a "good thing." I happen to disagree with that opinion. I find that view to be based more in dispensationalism than traditional Catholic teaching.
crusader1234 Posted January 26, 2005 Posted January 26, 2005 Be that as it may, how do you explain your lies?
popestpiusx Posted January 26, 2005 Posted January 26, 2005 A good thing? How can the re-establishment of the hierarchy of a false religion be a good thing? Crusader, I think you are overreacting here. If you think for one second that the Sanhedrin does not plan to re-institute the Passover sacrifice (in which case blood will most certainly flow there once again), you are fooling yourself. I don't think they will be able to (or at least I hope not), because it would, as you know, require the rebuilding of the Temple. It's been tried. God destroys it every time. In any case, I think you are out of line accusing James of lying.
jezic Posted January 26, 2005 Posted January 26, 2005 actually this isn't the only place i have seen that. It could be considered. It would fit the times right now. If they do, much will change in a hurry cause some people will go nuts.
james Posted January 26, 2005 Author Posted January 26, 2005 (edited) [quote name='crusader1234' date='Jan 25 2005, 11:51 PM'] Be that as it may, how do you explain your lies? [/quote] I have not lied. If you provide an example from something I've written which you interpret to be a lie, I'd be happy to clear up your misunderstanding. Edited January 26, 2005 by james
crusader1234 Posted January 26, 2005 Posted January 26, 2005 Sorry, you're right. You didn't lie. You did however, put emphasis on the passover sacrifice and blood spilling on Temple Mount, which makes the passover sacrifice seem like its human sacrifice when its really just a lamb. And I wouldn't say God crushed the Temple so much as God allowed it to be crushed as a result of faithless infidelity.
Guest Aluigi Posted January 26, 2005 Posted January 26, 2005 it was God's will that it be destroyed. God does not want it in existance anymore, that was the Old Covenant, He has made a New Covenant that has replaced the old. God will not receive their sacrifices kindly considering He already sent His Son to stop them once before.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now