popestpiusx Posted August 18, 2005 Posted August 18, 2005 Q, email me. I'd like to discuss something that I think most people on here may take wrong, so I would rather do it in private but can't because I cannot use the e-mail or pm function (due to my phish status which is the result of having spent too many years at sea).
Nathan Posted August 18, 2005 Posted August 18, 2005 (edited) One thing... A [i]neoconservative[/i] is a conservative who was once a liberal, but "converted" to conservatism over disatisfaction with the end results of liberalism. That's all the term means. It doesn't mean "super-conservative" or "ultra-conservative" or anything like that. A neocon is basically just a former liberal. Edited August 18, 2005 by Nathan
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted August 18, 2005 Author Posted August 18, 2005 By neo-conservative i meant new conservative. PopestPiusX, Do accept the Second Vatican council and/or any of the reforms following it?
cmotherofpirl Posted August 18, 2005 Posted August 18, 2005 [quote name='Fides_et_Ratio' date='Aug 17 2005, 08:33 PM']which decisions of V2 contradicted previous Catholic dogma? [right][snapback]688309[/snapback][/right] [/quote] We don't do catholic vs catholic here. Just because you don't understand it, doesn't mean its wrong. To imply that a decision contradicted previous church teaching is to cross the phatmass line.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now