FSSP

[Oik]

I'll wait for a statement that I can confirm issued y the FSSP.


As for the good or bad of it, I don't like it, personally. The FSSP was set up to promulgate the Mass of the 1962 Missal.

As for the priest shortage in this issue, those who enter the order of FSSP know why and what they are entering for. It seems rather confusing to have the FSSP priest perfom duties he isn't in the society for.

Of course, it's licit and up to the judgement of whoever the individual FSSP priest answers to.

It would be as if a Franciscan where to have to wear a Dominican habit.

[Oik]

Besides, both Masses are Masses of the Church. This argument/thread seems a little fishy to me.

Why would an FSSP preist have to say the NO Mass? Both Masses are valid and licit.

If an FSSP is functioning in a diocese, as an FSSP priest, under permission of the Bishop, why would it even be necessary for him to say the NO Mass?

[dUSt]

[quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Aug 25 2005, 05:32 PM']i think that the Tridentine mass still needs to be celebrated and if it isn't i could tell you i would leave the church. [right][snapback]699064[/snapback][/right][/quote]
Wow. Good thing you're Catholic for all the right reasons.

[Extra ecclesiam nulla salus]

[quote]Wow. Good thing you're Catholic for all the right reasons.[/quote]

for sure. but tell me if we went back to the Tridentine as the missa normitiva how many catholics would leave the church?

thousands would.

[Fidei Defensor]

[quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Aug 26 2005, 04:56 PM']for sure. but tell me if we went back to the Tridentine as the missa normitiva how many catholics would leave the church?

thousands would.
[right][snapback]700415[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
I think he is being sarcastic.

And it doesnt matter who leaves the Church over it. But I guess leaving the Church over that is just as silly as being in schism over the NO Mass.

[MC Just]

I think it would be beautiful, if the NO mass was celebrated )worldwide like it is at the Vatican and EWTN.(but inforced)I highly disagree with letting people mesh their cultures in with it.

That's just not a good idea. Latin use to be the universal language of the church, now it looks like the tower of babble. It's a giant mess.(language wise) When you let people do whatever they want with the liturgy there are going to be grave problems.

I've seen some of these problems. The shrine here in south texas is a prime example. Thats why i no longer go there. It is more like being at the superbowl than the mass. Music, the priest and feely touchy people are the center of the mass not the Eucharist. I was called an idiot because i didnt hold hands during the our father, which by the way isnt part of the mass, but an american trend and tradition.

Edited August 27, 2005 by MC Just

[Extra ecclesiam nulla salus]

[quote]I think he is being sarcastic.

And it doesnt matter who leaves the Church over it. But I guess leaving the Church over that is just as silly as being in schism over the NO Mass.

[/quote]

really? i didn't notice

(now im bieng sarcastic)