thessalonian Posted December 10, 2005 Posted December 10, 2005 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Dec 9 2005, 01:37 PM']You realize no one here's answered, just jumped on the question, right? [right][snapback]818626[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Well the fact of the matter is that the validity of the question can be challenged. Was there ever any sort of requirement for a papal oath to be signed? Did the Popes before Vatican II sign it. It seems from my limited research that they did not in general. That being the case the issue is misused and abused as "proof" of something. Cmom however did answer it. I liked her answer. Every single person does not have to answer. That's silly.
Socrates Posted December 10, 2005 Posted December 10, 2005 [quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Dec 9 2005, 02:23 PM']lol yeah i saw the 666 conteversoy. Paul VI said that his successor must be crowned, i wonder why John Paul I refused to be crowned. looks like the "True Pope" is wearing the Tiara [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/b7/GregoryXVII.jpg/150px-GregoryXVII.jpg[/img] [right][snapback]818717[/snapback][/right] [/quote] I gotta get me one of those!
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted December 10, 2005 Author Posted December 10, 2005 i never said it was required in anyway. all i said was why no more?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now