Jump to content
Join our Facebook Group ×
An Old School Catholic Message Board

You know what really GRINDS my gears?


Recommended Posts

let_go_let_God
Posted

[quote name='missionseeker' date='Apr 16 2006, 11:30 PM']What grinds my gears is when kids say that our YM preist is hypocritical when he asks them to sit with their families and not with their friends. They think it's a "holier than thou" thing. And then they sit in the back with their friends and text message during MAss.
[right][snapback]950219[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

I understand that one. At the last Confirmation retreat I helped on, we had 206 youth for 35 college leaders (Me as 1) First rule no cell phones period. five min later about 3 went off.

God bless-
LGLG

missionseeker
Posted

I did that to only at the beginning of the retreat the (you know big) leader had a box and said bring your cell phones up.

Well at the end of the retreat she was going to give back the phones but before she did my friend (who is also on the retreat team) said be honest how many of you kept your cell phones.
About 40 out 60 kids raised their hands,

let_go_let_God
Posted

Oh yeah, so we were allowed to confiscate on an individual basis. There was another retreat that I was on that they confiscated all watches, clocks, cellphones, iPods, and anything else that could be a distraction. It was the best retreat I have ever be on.

I only had to turn in my watch.

God bless-
LGLG

missionseeker
Posted

They weren't supposed to iPods either. One girl brought hers and lost it and started blaming people for stealing it. Pitched a huge fit.

let_go_let_God
Posted

The only one allowed to have an iPod on the Confirmation retreat I was on, was the priest leading the retreat. He had all the music for the skits and mellow worship time.

God bless-
LGLG

Posted

[quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Apr 16 2006, 05:41 PM']same beaver dam thing happened at the indult.
We had a family in front of us that was so bad. the father took the little boy who would not shut up, out of the church, and the mother and daughters stayed longer. but they kept falling asleep. and wouldn't shut their mouths. so eventually they all left. DEO GRATIAS! no wonder, there was no discipline. some out of towners came too. they came wearing volley ball outfits. i guess they didn't know it was a TLM.  :lol_roll:  one of their cell phones went off. he looked so embaressed  :lol_roll:

pet peeves:

Sandals

women who refuse to cover their heads

women who wear pants

jeans

shorts

t-shirts

kids that do not shut up
[right][snapback]949486[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

What is wrong with women wearing pants. I know you are ultra-traditional, but that shouldn't mean that you believe women should wear dresses only. That's not ultra-traditional, rather it sounds a little like opression. I understand the jeans and shorts thing as I too believe that it is proper to dress in you best Sunday attire, but women shouldn't have to not wear nice slacks.

Posted

[quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Apr 16 2006, 05:41 PM']same beaver dam thing happened at the indult.
We had a family in front of us that was so bad. the father took the little boy who would not shut up, out of the church, and the mother and daughters stayed longer. but they kept falling asleep. and wouldn't shut their mouths. so eventually they all left. DEO GRATIAS! no wonder, there was no discipline. some out of towners came too. they came wearing volley ball outfits. i guess they didn't know it was a TLM.  :lol_roll:  one of their cell phones went off. he looked so embaressed  :lol_roll:

pet peeves:

Sandals

women who refuse to cover their heads

women who wear pants

jeans

shorts

t-shirts

kids that do not shut up
[right][snapback]949486[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

Extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Posted

i already quote aquinas about it.

ill start a thread later.

Fidei Defensor
Posted

Sam, just an observation:

You seem less concerned about keeping the real Traditions of the Church, and more concerned about keeping all traditions, period. I mean, railing off about wearing pants? Honestly Sam.. I know you love the Church and all of her Tradition and tradition, but traditions can change. No one wants Tradition to change.

Extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Posted

[quote name='fidei defensor' date='Apr 17 2006, 11:17 AM']Sam, just an observation:

You seem less concerned about keeping the real Traditions of the Church, and more concerned about keeping all traditions, period.  I mean, railing off about wearing pants?  Honestly Sam.. I know you love the Church and all of her Tradition and tradition, but traditions can change. No one wants Tradition to change.
[right][snapback]950573[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]


it has nothing to do with tradition. it has more to do with wether it is a sin or not.

i think it is.

Keyser Soze
Posted

Dear Extra ecclesiam nulla salusperson,

You belong in the debate forum, and in diapers.

Love,

Nick

OverheadNite
Posted

What really grinds my gears is when kids are loud and act out, it always seems mostly at the consecration and homily, and parents don't even attempt to quiet them down. That REALLY grinds my gears.

Fidei Defensor
Posted

[quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Apr 17 2006, 12:19 PM']it has nothing to do with tradition. it has more to do with wether it is a sin or not.

i think it is.
[right][snapback]950575[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
Sam, it is a tradition. Its all about what is modest, and what was considered modest back then. It was traditionally considered that skirts and dresses on women was the way they should show modesty. However, today, they make pants for women, so it is possible for them to still dress modestly.

I think it is very silly to worry about whether or not women wearing pants is a sin. And if it is, it is how they are wearing them or what kind or what is on them, not the fact that they are pants.

amandaplus5
Posted

[quote]it has nothing to do with tradition. it has more to do with wether it is a sin or not.

i think it is.[/quote]

I really don't want to sound mean, but that's ridiculous. Do you honestly think that Christ is looking down on us and going "Aaarrggghhh, those stupid women are sinning by wearing pants! Everything is ruined now!"

Seriously, practices can change. And if you're going to take Church writings on this to back your point up, just remember the time and context that those were written in.

For example, in the Bible in Jeremiah, he says to beware of the heathens who cut down trees and decorate them. Back then, it was bad to do that because people worshipped the trees. Does this mean that it is a sin to have a Christmas tree now? Of course not, since we don't worship them. However, if one did not look at the time and context of this writing, he could come to the conclusion that Christmas trees are sinful.

Get what I'm saying?

OverheadNite
Posted

[quote name='amandaplus5' date='Apr 17 2006, 10:27 AM']I really don't want to sound mean, but that's ridiculous.  Do you honestly think that Christ is looking down on us and going "Aaarrggghhh, those stupid women are sinning by wearing pants!  Everything is ruined now!"

Seriously, practices can change.  And if you're going to take Church writings on this to back your point up, just remember the time and context that those were written in.

For example, in the Bible in Jeremiah, he says to beware of the heathens who cut down trees and decorate them.  Back then, it was bad to do that because people worshipped the trees.  Does this mean that it is a sin to have a Christmas tree now?  Of course not, since we don't worship them.  However, if one did not look at the time and context of this writing, he could come to the conclusion that Christmas trees are sinful.

Get what I'm saying?
[right][snapback]950586[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
It its outrageous to insist that wearing pants at Mass for women is a sin. Yea its not "old school" traditional, but in this world that we live in today, its should be the least of our worries. I have seen some women wearing "skirts" that were thigh high. That is far more immodest than jeans.

amandaplus5
Posted (edited)

[quote]I really don't want to sound mean, but that's ridiculous.  Do you honestly think that Christ is looking down on us and going "Aaarrggghhh, those stupid women are sinning by wearing pants!  Everything is ruined now!"

Seriously, practices can change.  And if you're going to take Church writings on this to back your point up, just remember the time and context that those were written in.

For example, in the Bible in Jeremiah, he says to beware of the heathens who cut down trees and decorate them.  Back then, it was bad to do that because people worshipped the trees.  Does this mean that it is a sin to have a Christmas tree now?  Of course not, since we don't worship them.  However, if one did not look at the time and context of this writing, he could come to the conclusion that Christmas trees are sinful.

Get what I'm saying?[/quote]



[quote]It its outrageous to insist that wearing pants at Mass for women is a sin. Yea its not "old school" traditional, but in this world that we live in today, its should be the least of our worries. I have seen some women wearing "skirts" that were thigh high. That is far more immodest than jeans.[/quote]

ummm, did you quote my post because you thought that i'm against women wearing pants? Because that is so not what I was saying...

Edited by amandaplus5

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...