kujo Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 (edited) Hey guys. I was reading an [url="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200609/POL20060920e.html"]article[/url] about how the House of Representatives passed a bill that would require all voters to show identification in order to cast their vote. The [url="http://www.house.gov/reichert/press06/9.20.06.2.shtml"]Republicans[/url] are for this, and most Democrats are against it. The Dems are saying that it would disenfranchise minorities, but they don't explain how. They liken it to poll taxes, but they don't explain why. Does anybody here have any issues with this? Am I missing something? Edited October 31, 2006 by hugheyforlife
Guest T-Bone Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 I too feel like I'm missing something... Unless the only reason the Demo's don't want this is because a large chunk of thier votes in certain districts come from homeless people that are bussed around from one polling place to another.
cmotherofpirl Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 I think it depends on what ID would be required. Not everyone has a drivers license, and if you would have to travel to a distant location with a lot of papers it would be a pain. I can see it could be necessary for areas with a high % transients. We really don't use them here even if required. What would be the point? You walk across to the church you have been going to for 50 years, wave hi to your next door neighbor as she checks you off and ya vote. It might decrease the population of large districts however, as they discover the actual address of many people is the local cemetery. Since we are going to computer screens I am sure the democrats will have a remedy to cure that problem.
Guest T-Bone Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 [quote name='cmotherofpirl' post='1104802' date='Oct 30 2006, 05:54 AM'] I think it depends on what ID would be required. Not everyone has a drivers license, and if you would have to travel to a distant location with a lot of papers it would be a pain. I can see it could be necessary for areas with a high % transients. [/quote] Most states issue non-licence IDs for a small fee. Maybe instead of engaging in election fraud, the Democrats could spend the money on supplying the small ($20-30 for five or six years) fee to those who cannot afford this. Any valid, photo ID would work. Government issued IDs are easy to come by. Maybe to appese the Democrats, the Republicans should insert an allowance that allows IDs issued by a local Methadone Clinc. [quote] We really don't use them here even if required. What would be the point? You walk across to the church you have been going to for 50 years, wave hi to your next door neighbor as she checks you off and ya vote. [/quote] Before Oregon passed the Voter Mail Fraud Act, my district was as such. The "proctors" knew you. Small districts are the easiest way to prevent election fraud. [quote] It might decrease the population of large districts however, as they discover the actual address of many people is the local cemetery. Since we are going to computer screens I am sure the democrats will have a remedy to cure that problem. [/quote] The dead have risen, and they're voting Republican!! --Bart Simpson
cmotherofpirl Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 [quote name='T-Bone' post='1105047' date='Oct 30 2006, 01:12 PM'] Most states issue non-licence IDs for a small fee. Maybe instead of engaging in election fraud, the Democrats could spend the money on supplying the small ($20-30 for five or six years) fee to those who cannot afford this. Any valid, photo ID would work. Government issued IDs are easy to come by. Maybe to appese the Democrats, the Republicans should insert an allowance that allows IDs issued by a local Methadone Clinc. Before Oregon passed the Voter Mail Fraud Act, my district was as such. The "proctors" knew you. Small districts are the easiest way to prevent election fraud. The dead have risen, and they're voting Republican!! --Bart Simpson [/quote] I'd object to have to pay to vote.
Red Knight Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 I read the House Bill. The acceptable ID is a government issued ID. There is verbiage in the bill that breaks down how the ID's are issued. For instance, if you drive and therefore have a license, that is your ID. If you don't drive and have money, you purchase a state ID. If you qualify for having no money, the state pays for the ID. I am all for voters requiring ID. The bill, as written, makes sense to me. [url="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.4844.EH:"]The Bill[/url]
Mercy me Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 [quote name='cmotherofpirl' post='1105052' date='Oct 30 2006, 01:15 PM'] I'd object to have to pay to vote. [/quote] The Georgia voter ID law that the courts just tossed out out went a step further. Not only would they provide a free ID card. They would go to your home to take you application. It was discriminatory because "certain groups are afraid of the authorities." I have no problem with voters being required to provide ID if they were first required to show proof of citizenship. In the state of Florida, it is illegal to ask someone registering to vote if they are a citizen. Yes, they have to sign the app under teh long line of legalese that says that they are US citizens. But they can't be asked by the person registering them. That came about with motor voter.I don't know if it is national.
kujo Posted October 30, 2006 Author Posted October 30, 2006 (edited) This is from the article that informed me of this issue: [quote]But the stance of the public is pretty clear. Accord to an NBC-Wall Street Journal poll, 81 percent support Voter ID- "Poll Tax, They Cry" [u]National Review[/u]; October 23, 2006[/quote] If this is the case, then what is the problem? Why does everything have to be racial? This obviously has absolutely NOTHING to do with race or taxing or whatever. It merely wants to protect our elections from an obvious-threat. Are we that polarized as a nation where the 2 parties can't even agree that we have to make sure that United States citizens are the only people who get to vote? One must question the motives of Democrats who oppose this bill--mainly, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (who likened the bill to literacy tests and grandfather clauses), Sen. Harry Reid (who spoke of a "dark era"), and Sen. John Kerry (who mentioned Jim Crow laws). Edited October 30, 2006 by kujo
Matty_boy Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 In some states, convicted felons are banned from voting. Also Democrats don't what to require IDs because they want the illegals to vote. There was a demonstration in Houston where illegal aliens were demanding their "rights" and there were democratic activists signing people up to vote.
Lil Red Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 how can people who are not here legally be allowed to vote? it doesn't make sense.
KizlarAgha Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 I hate this law. It would prevent me from voting. Plus national ID cards are a complete and total invasion of privacy. The government is not responsible for my identity, I am responsible for it.
track2004 Posted October 31, 2006 Posted October 31, 2006 (edited) I don't agree with this bill. It is basically a poll tax. It's not that you can't get a govt ID or anything, it's just that the law will make it necessary and it's hard to get one without having $30 to spare. I have to get a new license this week and besides all the craziness of finding the DMV and getting to the DMV (I don't have a car) I have to find money. I'm less than excited about it (besides the fact that the new one will say I'm 21 and that means fun things). Also it's kinda scary whenever someone proposes changing how we vote because basically always it's that party trying to keep certain people from voting. Not everyone has a govt ID, not everyone wants one and they shouldn't be required to vote. I thought that's why they send us those nifty voter registration cards anyway. [quote name='Lil Red' post='1105467' date='Oct 30 2006, 06:45 PM'] how can people who are not here legally be allowed to vote? it doesn't make sense. [/quote] How can people who have served their time and are rehabilitated NOT be allowed to vote? Edited October 31, 2006 by track2004
Socrates Posted October 31, 2006 Posted October 31, 2006 [quote name='Matty_boy' post='1105462' date='Oct 30 2006, 06:43 PM'] In some states, convicted felons are banned from voting. Also Democrats don't what to require IDs because they want the illegals to vote. There was a demonstration in Houston where illegal aliens were demanding their "rights" and there were democratic activists signing people up to vote. [/quote] This is the truth. Only people who are American citizens who actually contribute something to their community and country have any business voting. Illegal aliens, convicted felons, and free-loading bums should not be able to vote for our public servants. (And where unscrupulous Dems try to sneak such people into the voting booths, this helps contribute to the rise of the welfare state.)
Niccolò Posted October 31, 2006 Posted October 31, 2006 [quote name='KizlarAgha' post='1105468' date='Oct 30 2006, 06:45 PM'] I hate this law. It would prevent me from voting. Plus national ID cards are a complete and total invasion of privacy. The government is not responsible for my identity, I am responsible for it. [/quote] How would it prevent you from voting? If you don't drive and don't have money then this Georgia act stipulates that you can get an ID free of charge. I cannot for the life of me see how this would prevent anyone from voting, unless you were not supposed to vote in the first place. Seriously, if such a minor inconvenience stops one from voting, perhaps that shows how serious about voting they really are. And this is not really a national ID card, since a driver's license can be used.
track2004 Posted October 31, 2006 Posted October 31, 2006 It is more than a minor inconvenience for some people. Some people can't get off work to get to the DMV, or don't have transportation to it. Some people won't even know this law exists until they show up to vote. To get my new ID on Friday I have to get a bus, ride it 20 minutes to a part of town I've never been in, find the office, get there before the DMV closes, and pray to get the bus back home. Luckly I get a free ride on the bus because I'm a university student and I have $5 and I can look up where the office is and when it's open online, because otherwise I'd never be able to get it all done. And all that's just for a new ID because mine expires... sometimes I wish I could afford a car.
Socrates Posted October 31, 2006 Posted October 31, 2006 (edited) [quote name='track2004' post='1105724' date='Oct 30 2006, 10:19 PM'] It is more than a minor inconvenience for some people. Some people can't get off work to get to the DMV, or don't have transportation to it. Some people won't even know this law exists until they show up to vote. To get my new ID on Friday I have to get a bus, ride it 20 minutes to a part of town I've never been in, find the office, get there before the DMV closes, and pray to get the bus back home. Luckly I get a free ride on the bus because I'm a university student and I have $5 and I can look up where the office is and when it's open online, because otherwise I'd never be able to get it all done. And all that's just for a new ID because mine expires... sometimes I wish I could afford a car. [/quote] Poor baby. Government officials should come to everyone's door to take their vote right there, so there will be no effort or sacrifice made whatsoever on the voter's part. Freedom isn't free . . . Edited October 31, 2006 by Socrates
cmotherofpirl Posted October 31, 2006 Posted October 31, 2006 [quote name='Socrates' post='1105731' date='Oct 30 2006, 10:26 PM'] Poor baby. Government officials should come to everyone's door to take their vote right there, so there will be no effort or sacrifice made whatsoever on the voter's part. Freedom isn't free . . . [/quote] I actually have the same problem, I don't drive and the nearest ID place is at least 10 miles away, where there are no buses.
KizlarAgha Posted October 31, 2006 Posted October 31, 2006 (edited) This is such a clear example of selfish ignorance. People who aren't inconvenienced by a law like this assume that no-one else is inconvenienced - and if they are, then it's their fault for being inconvenienced. Cmom doesn't drive and has no buses, and doesn't want to walk 10 miles. Track has a problem getting there. Many people don't have 30 dollars to spare. There are those living below the poverty line who are legally here but working minimum wage jobs. They can barely afford rent and food for themselves and their families. But, hey, it's just 30 bucks says middle class white America. That's a lot of money to some people. It's sheer egocentrism on the part of the people who belittle others' reasons for not liking this bill. Oh, and Socrates, you said freedom isn't free. Remind me again, which part of the government forcing you to buy an ID from them so you can show it to vote is freedom? Edited October 31, 2006 by KizlarAgha
Guest T-Bone Posted October 31, 2006 Posted October 31, 2006 A question for the anti-voter identification crowd: How do you propose we prevent those who should not be voting from voting?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now