Kirisutodo333 Posted June 29, 2007 Posted June 29, 2007 [quote]A person who believes in the inerrancy of Gods Word can still accept "figurative language"[/quote] That's about the smartest thing I've heard you say. Tell me, what is the "literal" meaning of Genesis? And what is the pure definition of "inerrancy" as related to the Bible? You just contradicted yourself with this statement. Accepting "figurative language and literary devices used to project the Word of God and believing in the inerrancy of it" is the epitome of the Catholic Church. [quote]GIven you are in a church that believes world peace is best brought about by the UN and in a Vatican that wants to build God's kingdom for him, dont contradict yourself so much, you really do not believe the above in either sense.[/quote] no....not [i]in[/i] a church.....but [i]the[/i] church. don't forget that. [quote]So why play the race card here with your friends like your name is Al Sharpton?[/quote] I wasn't even in that conversation. But that doesn't matter to you does it? BTW-the whole "race card" argument like...doesn't even relate to Michael's original statement. Your logic is confusing. My nephew is more logical...and he's three. [quote]I think that makes you more a Jungian then a Christian.[/quote] No, I think that makes me a Christian who has studied Jung's concept of the "collective unconscious", which is genius by the way, especially when it explains the archetypes we find in Christian mythological stories like LOTR and Narnia. [quote]So humans are more cruel when they kill to eat, we go chasing our cows and chickens through the fields ready to rip them apart with our teeth? There again the ramfications of what human-animal hybrids would really mean goes WOOSHING over your head.[/quote] WOW! What did humans do to catch chickens 2000 years ago? Why did they have to use sharp wooden objects instead of their teeth? [quote]For all the blathering about my lack of education, I am seeing a lot of doh! moments coming from posters here. "collective unconscious" isnt a Christian concept, and neither is "cruel" human beings because they have dominion over animals.[/quote] Well DUH! (yeah, Budge, it's Duh, not Doh-yeah you know that education you're talking about?). Okay, Budge, with your wonderful education, please explain how the "collective unconscious" is not a Christian concept? And be sure to first explain what a "Christian concept" really is and what characteristics must be fulfilled to become a Christian concept. [quote]A future Jungian PETA member.[/quote] I mention "collective unconscious" and now I'm a future Jungian PETA member. Your logic is borderline sacrilegious.
Winchester Posted June 29, 2007 Posted June 29, 2007 [quote name='Budge' post='1305354' date='Jun 29 2007, 10:31 AM']Forget it. 1. You have disagreed with me throught this thread, at the very least INDIRECTLY defending these actions of science. 2. This was your only understated "outrage" {a weak doubleminded response}[/quote] You didn't rate on the Budge Meter O' Outrage, so she's sending you straight to Hell. As soon as she backs her wide load trailer out of the Box Canyon of Stupidity. Nazi card pulled and placed back into deck.
Winchester Posted June 29, 2007 Posted June 29, 2007 [quote name='Budge' post='1305354' date='Jun 29 2007, 10:31 AM']{but gee you support experimentation on those who say Sure!" Mengele couldnt have said it better.[/quote] Attention morons! Most every drug we have went through an experimental stage. Every procedure we use required experimentation. Mengele didn't ask for permission, Einstein. Bad analogy, no treat!
homeschoolmom Posted June 29, 2007 Posted June 29, 2007 Budge.... what is the debate? That the bishops support creating hybrids? Because that has been argued against and you have shown no such support for your claim. Please read this carefully for future reference. [url="http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/index.php?showtopic=67979"]http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/index.php?showtopic=67979[/url]
Winchester Posted August 29, 2007 Posted August 29, 2007 Bump. I know it's closed, but it's such a wonderful example of outright deception that I feel it belongs in my thread mining. This is an interesting tactic: A cross thread bump to demonstrate a pattern of "hit" and run tactics.
Recommended Posts