hyperdulia again Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 If this is offensive, someone can remove it, but a genuinely orthodox priest (the one who is the earthly reason for my, and Jon's, chastity) sent it to me. It made me laugh, but then again I have the sense of humor of dimwitted fourteen yearold . [url="http://www.bettybowers.com/homoagenda.html"]http://www.bettybowers.com/homoagenda.html[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Red Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 [quote]Well, if you have to ask, you are probably already under its pernicious influence and blithely hop-scotching your way straight to Hell. [/quote] funniest quote right there! :crackup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyperdulia again Posted December 31, 2004 Author Share Posted December 31, 2004 "As every Christian knows, there is only one enemy that threatens our entire civilization. And I am, of course, not talking about Satan. I'm talking about those damned homosexuals! " I liked this part. I almost died laughing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyperdulia again Posted December 31, 2004 Author Share Posted December 31, 2004 lit'rally..choked on my water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Red Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 :crackup: i know, thanks for sharing this, it made me laugh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
save ferris 101 Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 (edited) I don't see how it's so funny. All it is is a bunch of stereotypes. I'm sure you wouldn't be laughing if I did something of that nature about Catholics. and also, I don't know, but I think that it was kind of supposed to be sarcastic, not really making fun of homosexuals, because at the bottom, the site was promoting anti-Republican pins and such. I will have to check this site out to see if the article was written by a liberal or conservative. Edited December 31, 2004 by save ferris 101 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyperdulia again Posted December 31, 2004 Author Share Posted December 31, 2004 (edited) I'm Catholic. I'm a hmosexual. And I do laugh at Catholics. And I know it was making fun of conservative Christians not homosexuals. And I'm not a Republican. And it's a joke site whose sole purpose is to poke fun at us (Christians) and some of the silly stuff we say/do. Edited December 31, 2004 by hyperdulia again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
save ferris 101 Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 [quote name='hyperdulia again' date='Dec 31 2004, 12:22 AM'] I'm Catholic. I'm a hmosexual. And I do laugh at Catholics. And I know it was making fun of conservative Christians not homosexuals. And I'm not a Republican. And it's a joke site whose sole purpose is to poke fun at us (Christians) and some of the silly stuff we say/do. [/quote] um, so, what are you saying. I'm sorry, it's just, I don't understand your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benedict Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 If you cannot laugh at yourself (I am a Catholic [i]and [/i]a registered Republican), then you have no business laughing. Not that that has any relevance. Or maybe it does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 3. Explicit treatment of the problem was given in this Congregation's "Declaration on Certain Questions Concerning Sexual Ethics" of December 29, 1975. That document stressed the duty of trying to understand the homosexual condition and noted that culpability for homosexual acts should only be judged with prudence. At the same time the Congregation took note of the distinction commonly drawn between the homosexual condition or tendency and individual homosexual actions. These were described as deprived of their essential and indispensable finality, as being "intrinsically disordered", and able in no case to be approved of (cf. n. 8, sect. 4). In the discussion which followed the publication of the Declaration, however, an overly benign interpretation was given to the homosexual condition itself, some going so far as to call it neutral, or even good. Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less strong tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil; and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder. Therefore special concern and pastoral attention should be directed toward those who have this condition, lest they be led to believe that the living out of this orientation in homosexual activity is a morally acceptable option. It is not. [url="http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_df86ho.htm"]http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_df86ho.htm[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
traichuoi Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 [quote]recruit all children grades Kindergarten through 12 into your [u][b]amoral[/b][/u], filthy lifestyle[/quote] this just goes to show that Jesus Freaks have no idea about moralities...amoral means nonmoral...meaning it has nothing to do with morals... like how eating a donut has nothing to do with morals... funny Jesus Freak writers...lol great piece though Hyper...gota a kick out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soldier4Him Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 ouy. sad. very very sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pio Nono Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 JMJ 12/31 - St. Sylvester I know how to take a joke, and though it's funny, the rest of the website is outright demonic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbie Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 As both a Catholic and a homosexual I think this was quite funny and it's pretty obvious to me at least that this was making fun of close-mindedness amongst some traditionalist american republicans by using reidiculous stereotypes about homosexuals from a supposed right-winger. How about a red-neck agenda to balance things? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyperdulia again Posted January 4, 2005 Author Share Posted January 4, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts