hyperdulia again Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 If this is offensive, someone can remove it, but a genuinely orthodox priest (the one who is the earthly reason for my, and Jon's, chastity) sent it to me. It made me laugh, but then again I have the sense of humor of dimwitted fourteen yearold . [url="http://www.bettybowers.com/homoagenda.html"]http://www.bettybowers.com/homoagenda.html[/url]
Lil Red Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 [quote]Well, if you have to ask, you are probably already under its pernicious influence and blithely hop-scotching your way straight to Hell. [/quote] funniest quote right there! :crackup:
hyperdulia again Posted December 31, 2004 Author Posted December 31, 2004 "As every Christian knows, there is only one enemy that threatens our entire civilization. And I am, of course, not talking about Satan. I'm talking about those damned homosexuals! " I liked this part. I almost died laughing.
hyperdulia again Posted December 31, 2004 Author Posted December 31, 2004 lit'rally..choked on my water.
Lil Red Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 :crackup: i know, thanks for sharing this, it made me laugh!
save ferris 101 Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 (edited) I don't see how it's so funny. All it is is a bunch of stereotypes. I'm sure you wouldn't be laughing if I did something of that nature about Catholics. and also, I don't know, but I think that it was kind of supposed to be sarcastic, not really making fun of homosexuals, because at the bottom, the site was promoting anti-Republican pins and such. I will have to check this site out to see if the article was written by a liberal or conservative. Edited December 31, 2004 by save ferris 101
hyperdulia again Posted December 31, 2004 Author Posted December 31, 2004 (edited) I'm Catholic. I'm a hmosexual. And I do laugh at Catholics. And I know it was making fun of conservative Christians not homosexuals. And I'm not a Republican. And it's a joke site whose sole purpose is to poke fun at us (Christians) and some of the silly stuff we say/do. Edited December 31, 2004 by hyperdulia again
save ferris 101 Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 [quote name='hyperdulia again' date='Dec 31 2004, 12:22 AM'] I'm Catholic. I'm a hmosexual. And I do laugh at Catholics. And I know it was making fun of conservative Christians not homosexuals. And I'm not a Republican. And it's a joke site whose sole purpose is to poke fun at us (Christians) and some of the silly stuff we say/do. [/quote] um, so, what are you saying. I'm sorry, it's just, I don't understand your point.
Benedict Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 If you cannot laugh at yourself (I am a Catholic [i]and [/i]a registered Republican), then you have no business laughing. Not that that has any relevance. Or maybe it does.
james Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 3. Explicit treatment of the problem was given in this Congregation's "Declaration on Certain Questions Concerning Sexual Ethics" of December 29, 1975. That document stressed the duty of trying to understand the homosexual condition and noted that culpability for homosexual acts should only be judged with prudence. At the same time the Congregation took note of the distinction commonly drawn between the homosexual condition or tendency and individual homosexual actions. These were described as deprived of their essential and indispensable finality, as being "intrinsically disordered", and able in no case to be approved of (cf. n. 8, sect. 4). In the discussion which followed the publication of the Declaration, however, an overly benign interpretation was given to the homosexual condition itself, some going so far as to call it neutral, or even good. Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less strong tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil; and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder. Therefore special concern and pastoral attention should be directed toward those who have this condition, lest they be led to believe that the living out of this orientation in homosexual activity is a morally acceptable option. It is not. [url="http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_df86ho.htm"]http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_df86ho.htm[/url]
traichuoi Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 [quote]recruit all children grades Kindergarten through 12 into your [u][b]amoral[/b][/u], filthy lifestyle[/quote] this just goes to show that Jesus Freaks have no idea about moralities...amoral means nonmoral...meaning it has nothing to do with morals... like how eating a donut has nothing to do with morals... funny Jesus Freak writers...lol great piece though Hyper...gota a kick out of it.
Pio Nono Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 JMJ 12/31 - St. Sylvester I know how to take a joke, and though it's funny, the rest of the website is outright demonic.
robbie Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 As both a Catholic and a homosexual I think this was quite funny and it's pretty obvious to me at least that this was making fun of close-mindedness amongst some traditionalist american republicans by using reidiculous stereotypes about homosexuals from a supposed right-winger. How about a red-neck agenda to balance things?
spathariossa Posted January 4, 2005 Posted January 4, 2005 I'd classify this as mildly amusing. IMHO it made fun of homosexuals more than it did Christian conservatives. The stereotypes with stylists and personal trainers and cell phones...wow... Not that this made it any less amusing. I'm just not easily amused these days...
ironmonk Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 [quote name='hyperdulia again' date='Dec 31 2004, 01:34 AM'] If this is offensive, someone can remove it, but a genuinely orthodox priest (the one who is the earthly reason for my, and Jon's, chastity) sent it to me. It made me laugh, but then again I have the sense of humor of dimwitted fourteen yearold . [url="http://www.bettybowers.com/homoagenda.html"]http://www.bettybowers.com/homoagenda.html[/url] [/quote] The site is mocking Baptists and other people who claim the Christian name. It's a liberal site. [url="http://www.bettybowers.com/"]http://www.bettybowers.com/[/url] God Bless, ironmonk
ironmonk Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 [quote name='ironmonk' date='Jan 4 2005, 10:55 PM'] The site is mocking Baptists and other people who claim the Christian name. It's a liberal site. [url="http://www.bettybowers.com/"]http://www.bettybowers.com/[/url] God Bless, ironmonk [/quote] The whois... Attorney At Law (29899881O) 220 Renaissance Parkway Atlanta, GA 30308 US Phone: (404) 982-2240 Fax: 999 999 9999 Domain Name: BETTYBOWERS.COM Administrative Contact : Bowers, Betty (PB12210) Betty@BETTYBOWERS.COM 1495 W PACES FERRY RD NW ATLANTA, GA 30327-2442 US Phone: (404) 982-2240 Fax: (404) 874-4620 Technical Contact : Rhyton Corporation, (DA8455-ORG) dns@RHYTON.COM PO BOX 15010 FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33318-5010 US Phone: (954) 424-7473 Fax: - (954) 472-3609 Record expires on 10-Jul-2005 Record created on 10-Jul-1999 Database last updated on 08-Jul-2004
Iacobus Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 "If you can't laugh at yourself, life can be well too long." BTW, Ironmonk, I have seen that site and sites like it before and they do poiint out some problems. SOME Christians, Catholics too, have a hard time dividing the sin and the sinner, esp when it comes to homosexuality. We tend to get most upset when others do wrong something that we oursleves do it as well.
Socrates Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 I didn't bother to look at the site in question, and doubt I'd find it amusing. The whole "gay" agenda seems to have saturated our culture. I find it disturbing that phatmassers are identifying themselves (almost proudly, it seems) as "Catholic and homosexual." "Catholic and homosexual" is a contradiction in terms. Homosexuals are among those St. Paul says will not inherit the Kingdom. It is a shame that Catholics should proclaim this hideous sin as their identity. "I am Catholic and an adulterer." "I am Catholic and a murderer." "I am Catholic and a liar." Get my point? If one struggles with temptation in this regard, he should pray for deliverance from and distance himself from this sin, not use it to label and define himself! This is the language of "gay rights." It reminds me of that ex-governor of New Jersey who after being caught in a homosexual relationship with a male subordinate, declared, "I am a gay American," as if this was somehow patriotic and enobling. Someone in a column I read pointed out that if he had offered a pretty woman a high-paying position for having adulterous sex with her, he'd be just considered a creep, not a victim. Why doesn't he say "I'm a lying American"? Think about it.
Recommended Posts