NEW Reference Section Discussion...

[phatcatholic]

also, Cure, when someone reports a link, i can't respond to them, so i'm responding to u here. the name and email that the form is requesting is that of the reporter, not an admin's. also, the link u reported was actually in the wrong place anyway, so i deleted it. the same article is also in the "masturbation and other sexual sins" section, so i updated the url there.

[goldenchild17]

Yeah I know this doesn't go here but I wanted to put this here.

[url="http://www.cin.org/users/james/files/talmud.htm"]http://www.cin.org/users/james/files/talmud.htm[/url]

Good article, wasn't sure if you had it in the reference section. I'm sure you do but just wanted to be sure.

[phatcatholic]

[quote name='goldenchild17' date='Aug 2 2005, 01:28 PM']Yeah I know this doesn't go here but I wanted to put this here.

[url="http://www.cin.org/users/james/files/talmud.htm"]http://www.cin.org/users/james/files/talmud.htm[/url]

Good article, wasn't sure if you had it in the reference section.  I'm sure you do but just wanted to be sure.
[right][snapback]668707[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
already got it

[phatcatholic]

what do u all think about me putting the entries in alphabetical order?

[phatcatholic]

bump for dUSt..................read my posts to u on the last two pages of this thread

[journeyman]

[quote name='Cure of Ars' date='Jul 23 2005, 09:37 PM']I prefer noble steed. 

[right][snapback]656219[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]


a thoroughbred

[phatcatholic]

what do you all think about me putting the entries in alphabetical order?

[franciscanheart]

i think its a good idea

[Cure of Ars]

I personly think it's a wast of time. The fastes way to find something is to use the search engine and then click on the catigory. alphabetical order is not going to help much because it is hard to know what word you are putting something under.

The time could be better used. But this is just my opinion.

[franciscanheart]

i thought it was just an option he could choose or something? didnt they go in alphabetically?

[Cure of Ars]

[quote name='journeyman' date='Aug 9 2005, 06:25 PM']a thoroughbred     
[right][snapback]679167[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]


How about plain old stud.

[Cure of Ars]

[quote name='hugheyforlife' date='Aug 9 2005, 09:39 PM']i thought it was just an option he could choose or something? didnt they go in alphabetically?
[right][snapback]679414[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]


I think he is talking about doing the headings which he would have to do himself.

[phatcatholic]

i'm just talking about the main headings that you see on the home page of the directory..............not all the articles or even all the sub-entries, just the main ones. shouldn't take that long.

i'm gonna go ahead and do it.

[franciscanheart]

oh. hmm....

[dUSt]

I don't think it's a good idea. Having the most used at the top is better because in most cases, users won't know how the subject they are looking for is titled anyway until they see it.

[franciscanheart]

yeah i dont realy think its a great idea either.... i thought you were talking about something else.

[phatcatholic]

i'm talking about the main entries:

--The Bible
--Sacred Tradition
--Church Authority, Apostolic Succession
--Peter and the Papacy
--Mary

....and so on. you all don't think those should be in alphabetical order?

also, dUSt, did u check ur phatmass email?

[franciscanheart]

i know what youre talking about now and no i dont think you should alphabetize them. i think they were fine like they were originally.

btw - i think dUSt wanted you to email his gmail account

[phatcatholic]

note to self:

CUF articles: start with "May a Lay Person Expose the Blessed Sacrament?"

[phatcatholic]

note to self:

go here:
[url="http://matt1618.freeyellow.com/salvation.html"]http://matt1618.freeyellow.com/salvation.html[/url]

start w/ "Reasoning from the Scriptures......"