Guest JeffCR07 Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 this thread is silly. If Cam is a Modernist, we're all doomed That's all I have to say :
Cam42 Posted January 13, 2006 Author Posted January 13, 2006 [quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Jan 13 2006, 10:57 AM']not all of us...... [right][snapback]854947[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Are you saying I am an adherernt to the Modernist heresy, Sam?
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 depends Cam. I don't really know what you believe.
Cam42 Posted January 13, 2006 Author Posted January 13, 2006 [quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Jan 13 2006, 11:43 AM']depends Cam. I don't really know what you believe. [right][snapback]855004[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Have you ever read anything I have posted? My views are in complete conformity with the Catholic Church on matters of faith and morals. You had better be able to back up your statement. Or apologize.
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 I didn't call you a modernist.
Laudate_Dominum Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 [quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Jan 13 2006, 10:09 AM']I didn't call you a modernist. [right][snapback]855034[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Sam, I just found out that I can't PM you so forgive me for this wee hijacking. I wanted to note that I realize that my recent post in the QA in response to your question regarding canon 28 of Chalcedon was a bit scattered and sloppy, but I was wondering if I addressed the issues to your satisfaction? I feel a bit inspired to give it a second try with a more comprehensive response as the subject of Chalcedon is actually one of interest to me, and it ought to be dealt with in a most careful and thoughtful manner. But if you're all set I suppose I would just be wasting my time. God bless.
Cam42 Posted January 13, 2006 Author Posted January 13, 2006 [quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Jan 13 2006, 12:09 PM']I didn't call you a modernist. [right][snapback]855034[/snapback][/right] [/quote] You said my adherence to the Modernist Heresy depended? That is a pretty damning statement Sam. [url="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10415a.htm"]Modernism[/url], what part of this do I adhere? Or what part of [url="http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius10/p10pasce.htm"]PASCENDI DOMINICI GREGIS [/url] do I subscribe to. You said it depended. What parts of this does it depend upon? C'mon Sam, back up your position or aplogize.
Laudate_Dominum Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 [quote name='Cam42' date='Jan 13 2006, 10:14 AM']You said my adherence to the Modernist Heresy depended? That is a pretty damning statement Sam. [url="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10415a.htm"]Modernism[/url], what part of this do I adhere? Or what part of [url="http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius10/p10pasce.htm"]PASCENDI DOMINICI GREGIS [/url] do I subscribe to. You said it depended. What parts of this does it depend upon? C'mon Sam, back up your position or aplogize. [right][snapback]855039[/snapback][/right] [/quote] If you're a modernist I wonder what that would make me? I categorically oppose limbo!! Anathema sit?
Cam42 Posted January 13, 2006 Author Posted January 13, 2006 [quote name='Laudate_Dominum' date='Jan 13 2006, 12:15 PM']If you're a modernist I wonder what that would make me? I categorically oppose limbo!! Anathema sit? [right][snapback]855041[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Anathema sit!!!! Love it!!!!!!
Laudate_Dominum Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 [quote name='toledo_jesus' date='Jan 13 2006, 10:34 AM']ugh, who brought this back up... [right][snapback]855062[/snapback][/right] [/quote] It was Jeff!! He's a witch!!! Burn him anyway!
Laudate_Dominum Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 random spam: I just peeped the spy feature and it said that the Google.com bot is "Printing a topic". Wtfreek? I'd like to see a bot go to the printer, pick up a sheet of paper and read it.. That's weird.
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 [quote name='Cam42' date='Jan 13 2006, 11:14 AM']You said my adherence to the Modernist Heresy depended? That is a pretty damning statement Sam. [url="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10415a.htm"]Modernism[/url], what part of this do I adhere? Or what part of [url="http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius10/p10pasce.htm"]PASCENDI DOMINICI GREGIS [/url] do I subscribe to. You said it depended. What parts of this does it depend upon? C'mon Sam, back up your position or aplogize. [right][snapback]855039[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Jeff said that if you were a modernist then we all would be lost. I disagreed. I don't what you believe, nor would I call you a modernist.
Laudate_Dominum Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 [quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Jan 13 2006, 11:05 AM']Jeff said that if you were a modernist then we all would be lost. I disagreed. I don't what you believe, nor would I call you a modernist. [right][snapback]855089[/snapback][/right] [/quote] What if I were to demonstrate based on selections from your past posts contrasted with the syllabus of errors and the decree against modernism that you are in fact a modernist? I'm thinking of doing this just for fun sometime when I have time to kill. As a joke so don't worry. :
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 (edited) sure. Edited January 13, 2006 by Extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Laudate_Dominum Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 [quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Jan 13 2006, 11:21 AM']sure. [right][snapback]855107[/snapback][/right] [/quote] cool. thanks man. btw, did you see my PM on the previous page?
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 (edited) Sam, I just found out that I can't PM you so forgive me for this wee hijacking. I wanted to note that I realize that my recent post in the QA in response to your question regarding canon 28 of Chalcedon was a bit scattered and sloppy, but I was wondering if I addressed the issues to your satisfaction? I feel a bit inspired to give it a second try with a more comprehensive response as the subject of Chalcedon is actually one of interest to me, and it ought to be dealt with in a most careful and thoughtful manner. But if you're all set I suppose I would just be wasting my time. God bless. yes i i did see it. your answer was Actually quite good. Thanks a lot! Sam Edited January 13, 2006 by Extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Laudate_Dominum Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 [quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Jan 13 2006, 11:57 AM']yes i i did see it. your answer was Actually quite good. Thanks a lot! Sam [right][snapback]855137[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Coolio.. If you think of anything else let me know as I'm eager to continue ranting about Chalcedon and the early councils in general.. Maybe I'll make a thread in the Apologetics board.
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 cool i love early councils.
Recommended Posts