qfnol31 Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 I think there's a commentary on it which makes the distinction you just combined.
homeschoolmom Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 [quote name='Socrates' date='Nov 29 2005, 10:31 PM'] (theme from The Godfather plays) "Johnny, Johnny, now you come to me on the day of my daughter's wedding, asking for 'justice' . . ." [right][snapback]804695[/snapback][/right] [/quote] aaa... aaaAAA... AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!! [img]http://www.democrats.com/files/images/thumb_c643d34aa46c0ad9cada07f0dbca88c9-4221.jpg[/img]
RC_ Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 [quote name='John Lowell' date='Nov 29 2005, 10:04 PM']dUSt, Since you invited this step I thought I'd keep you posted. I've looked into FTC remedies both for what's been happening here over the last several days and, evidently, even more intensely so in the last hour. Unfortunately, its doubtful that the FTC can be of much help to me so a complaint there will not be pursued after all. Other, far more promising avenues would seem available, however, and, if I find them to have merit, they'll be taken. Stay tuned. John Lowell [right][snapback]804669[/snapback][/right] [/quote] [mod]Personal attack - dUSt[/mod]
tojo Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 [quote name='dairygirl4u2c' date='Nov 29 2005, 11:39 PM']This John fellow by the way hes actings seems fake. To me, no rational person would attack phatmass! There's porn on other websites not to mention things ten times worse. What more, this place is where this type of hootin' and hollerin's suppose to take place. Probably at least one reason all those websites can exist, why they should be able to, and why this one should and will persist, is because anyone has the option to just leave if they don't like something. If he's upset at his name being slandered, maybe he should have thought twice before posting his screen name as his real name. Not that he was slandered, as any court would recognize. Maybe he's just having a good time or someone's posing, upset about something in the past. Plus Soc is right that you don't go into a thread and hijack it. Maybe he should be pursued. I say call him on his bluff. Don't give in, and I'd even call him out and have him prove himself to exist and be genuine, not a lame prankster, which I think he is. It's too hard for me to imagine he's genuinely lame. [right][snapback]804780[/snapback][/right] [/quote] See, even dairy's on our side and we give her a plenty hard time all the time! (Sorry about that btw.) Socrates is a bit brusque, but he's not as bas as all this. And John, if you don't like the way dUSt runs his phorum, start your own and run it the way you want to. It's a free Internet....
philothea Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 Neverminding the discussion here, I wanted to note that this... [quote name='toledo_jesus' date='Nov 28 2005, 09:25 PM']When you exist as nothing more than text you should probably try to be the best text you can be. [right][snapback]803115[/snapback][/right] [/quote] ...is a quite excellent statement, all by itself. (Kinda depressing for me personally, but still good.)
toledo_jesus Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 [quote name='toledo_jesus' date='Nov 28 2005, 10:52 PM']Now, we drop the subject. [right][snapback]803239[/snapback][/right] [/quote] As usual...people can't just drop something that's going nowhere. Does everyone feel better? John Lowell's left the site. I think that's a record for chasing someone off.
Theoketos Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 The internet is over rated. I still fear geese.
Guest T-Bone Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 You need not fear geese. Zombie geese on the other hand...
dUSt Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 [quote name='toledo_jesus' date='Nov 30 2005, 01:08 PM']Does everyone feel better? John Lowell's left the site. I think that's a record for chasing someone off. [right][snapback]805483[/snapback][/right] [/quote] I know I do. I was fearing prison time.
toledo_jesus Posted December 1, 2005 Posted December 1, 2005 [quote name='T-Bone' date='Nov 30 2005, 04:42 PM']You need not fear geese. Zombie geese on the other hand... [right][snapback]805860[/snapback][/right] [/quote] geese can't be zombies. zombies crave human flesh, and so don't attack animals.
philothea Posted December 1, 2005 Posted December 1, 2005 [quote name='toledo_jesus' date='Nov 30 2005, 07:09 PM']geese can't be zombies. zombies crave human flesh, and so don't attack animals. [right][snapback]806126[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Unless someone accidentally embalms a goose with worcestershire sauce... (I should probably hope no one here gets that reference.)
journeyman Posted December 1, 2005 Posted December 1, 2005 since you brought it up, Wikipedia suggests you may watch South Park or perhaps you're analogizing to hangover remedies?
philothea Posted December 1, 2005 Posted December 1, 2005 (edited) I don't watch television at all!! : (But I used to. Yes, it's from South Park. And BTW, worcestershire sauce tech support says that all you have to do is kill the original zombie, and all the rest will go back to normal. Whatever you do, don't go on some kind of chainsaw massacre zombie-killing spree.) Edited December 1, 2005 by philothea
journeyman Posted December 1, 2005 Posted December 1, 2005 Phatmass is always a place of learning . . . how will we distinguish the "source" zombie and avoid the chainsaw reaction . . . will it be the one with the subtle odor of Worcestershire beneath the overarching smell of decay? and who volunteers to get close enough to detect the "eau de worcestershire" and is quick and nimble enough to test more than candidate?
philothea Posted December 1, 2005 Posted December 1, 2005 [quote name='journeyman' date='Nov 30 2005, 09:31 PM']Phatmass is always a place of learning . . . how will we distinguish the "source" zombie and avoid the chainsaw reaction . . . will it be the one with the subtle odor of Worcestershire beneath the overarching smell of decay? and who volunteers to get close enough to detect the "eau de worcestershire" and is quick and nimble enough to test more than candidate? [right][snapback]806320[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Because you know who was already dead and being embalmed! (Kenny, obviously. It's always Kenny.) And the original topic was dumb anyway.
homeschoolmom Posted December 1, 2005 Posted December 1, 2005 Didn't anyone like my "horse head in bed" picture?
Socrates Posted December 1, 2005 Posted December 1, 2005 [quote name='homeschoolmom' date='Nov 30 2005, 10:54 PM']Didn't anyone like my "horse head in bed" picture? [right][snapback]806482[/snapback][/right] [/quote] I thought it was funny! That'll be Dust after John Lowell has pursued his "far more promising avenues."
Recommended Posts