Fides_et_Ratio Posted September 9, 2006 Posted September 9, 2006 At first I was going to protest that I was the only girl on this desert oasis (and what would I be doing there with 3 guys?) but then I remembered Budge is also a girl, so my objection subsided. And don't worry, Eutychus, if we were really stuck at a remote oasis in the desert, I wouldn't neglect neglect your physical needs. It would be an opportunity to minister to Jesus (cf. Matthew 25:35-40). Instead of arguing about Hell, I'd be praying for the Lord to provide water for you, and Budge, and Winchester.
Budge Posted September 9, 2006 Author Posted September 9, 2006 (edited) Why would I pray for rain? I would witness to the lot of you because your eternal destination would be a lot more important rather then getting physical needs met. Especially if we were all facing near death. I would ask God then praying with whatever other Christian there was, {not praying with Catholics} to 1. Bring you folks to Him, 2. to send us RESCUERS. BUT YOU SHOULD THINK ABOUT JESUS rescuing YOU FROM HELL first.... Why think so small? [What you going to catch the rain in, one of your shoes? guess if someone had a knife on them you could hollow out a bowl real quick out of a tree limb....] This is the problem with Catholicism it looks to this world. Selling out the gospel for WORLD peace, focusing on social work. Building treasures in heaven or the final eternal destiny of folks is ignored. Oh by the way water can be found on a desert osasis, if plants are there usually means water can be found, get a twig and start digging.. Edited September 9, 2006 by Budge
Farsight one Posted September 10, 2006 Posted September 10, 2006 [quote name='Eutychus' post='1059777' date='Sep 9 2006, 05:35 PM'] Catholic response, PRAY FOR RAIN TOGETHER. REAL Evangelical Christian response, who cares about rain? Let me tell you about hell, how you can avoid it, who Jesus Christ is, what He did, and why YOU need to find Him. Your way, MAY end up with five people on a wet island. Christ;s/Evangelical's way, ends up with FIVE followers of Christ, saved for all eternity. AMEN?? [/quote]You've witnessed to people before, right? Can you honestly say that doing so in this situation is going to result in sucess? You really think you'd end up with five followers of Christ? Let me tell you about real life. Depending on who you're witnessing to, you MIGHT get one convert, but most likely you'd only get a bloody nose, or worse. I've said it plenty before, and I'll say it again. Become a friend first, then they'll listen to you. By not becoming their friend first, YOU greatly reduce the chances of conversion as well as build up a wall for them so that they are less responsive to evangelization in the future. It becomes YOUR fault that they refuse to believe. All because you wanted to take the easy way out skip a couple of important steps. When a chef prepares pufferfish, skipping only one of the 43(ish) steps required to make it edible, their patron will at the very least be sick for a couple of days or quite possibly die from it. Do you really want that weight on your shoulders? The knowledge that you could have done better, but the little red guy on your shoulder told you to skip a bit and you listened to him? Trust me, it smells of elderberries big time.
Budge Posted September 10, 2006 Author Posted September 10, 2006 (edited) [quote] Depending on who you're witnessing to, you MIGHT get one convert, but most likely you'd only get a bloody nose, or worse. [/quote] YEAH that stopped Paul, that bloody nose threat... {stoned, scourged five times, beaten with rods three times} Edited September 10, 2006 by Budge
Farsight one Posted September 10, 2006 Posted September 10, 2006 Getting punched in the face, or even stoned and scourged shouldn't deter you. I definitely agree with that. But, it is a sign that that particular way of doing things isn't working, and it might be a good idea to try a different approach. So, while youre getting stoned and scourged and building up their resistances to your's and anyone else's words of evangelization, I'm becoming friends with the sinners. And while you're still getting stoned and scourged and beaten up for attempting to convert people, I'm friends with these sinners and they'll actually listen to what I have to say about God and understand why I'm telling them this and not stone me or scourge me, but in fact thank me. Not only is my method [i]on average faster[/i], but I also get more converts than you.
Eutychus Posted September 10, 2006 Posted September 10, 2006 (edited) [quote] why I'm telling them this and not stone me or scourge me, but in fact thank me. Not only is my method on average faster, but I also get more converts than you.[/quote] { for ONCE I am dead serious here....ok?} The wrong kind of "convert" comes from this approach. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE take a look at this, without ANY agenda here. Watch the segment, [color="#CC0000"][b][i]HELLS BEST KEPT SECRET[/i][/b][/color] [url="http://www.wayofthemaster.com/learntoshare.shtml"][b]CLICK HERE - WORKS TOO - PLEASE WATCH IT NON DENOMINATIONAL[/b][/url] Edited September 10, 2006 by Eutychus
Farsight one Posted September 10, 2006 Posted September 10, 2006 I listened to the whole thing. It was quite interesting, and I'm listening to the other one right now. I took some notes, which I'm leaving in the topic. Don't read 'em if you don't want, but they're there if you want to. [quote]Scare tactics? boo... people turn away by my method, but at least they got a chance when talking to people, we really go about it the same way. fully explained. better flight=better life jump to come=eternal life the honestly wanting to convert and repent guy didn't know what sin was reverted back to sinfulness but I would be sure to explain the difference the guy's kind of funny. such a thing as a christian comedian? don't want to be saved till they know they're in danger so i tell them they're in danger after they're my friend they trust to speak the truth, but not a stranger sinners have all seen the disease, they just don't recognize it as such a fornicator and blasphemer can still be a christian turns the light on slowly, so as not to blind and offend expose one to the faith patiently? jesus loves you - no biblical basis for it doesn't say anything about man coming out of the deep sleep either did the track cut out and change to another speech half way through? heard a click and everything sounded different by the good of God, he MUST punish sinners, rather than overlook ...unless they repent? xrays won't show poison all about converting for the right motive instead of the wrong nope, not scare tactics.[/quote] Anyways, listening to it helped me to better understand why you choose your method of evangelization. I think I have to stick with my method though. Converting people has often been looked at as a war. In a war the enemy has infantry, tanks, artillery, aircraft, anti aircraft guns, maybe a or two, etc, etc. If the good guys use only infantry in a battle, the tanks will rip them apart. If they use only artillery, the aircraft will destroy them with ease. In a war you HAVE to use many different types of units/methods of attack, or you will fail horribly. Your method may work on group one, but not group two, and my method may work on group two, but not group one.
Winchester Posted September 10, 2006 Posted September 10, 2006 But cutting the supply lines always works. And as for focusing (in part) on social work, acts of mercy are God approved. All that least of my people, thing that good ole Jesus rambled on about. Easy to overlook between the condemn your enemies and the suffering of the unbelievers, and not as fun or good at massaging the old ego, but hey who thinks people have an easier time believing in a loving and charitable God if His supposed followers help ease their earthly pains?
stbernardLT Posted September 10, 2006 Posted September 10, 2006 It realy scares me how Budge and Eutychus will believe any source they find. I couldn't even agree with that many internet sources if I tried. This should be a sign of a blind protestant approach. Their main agenda is anything noncatholic to the point that they don't even consider truth anymore. They will spew anything and everything that looks good, regardless of the actual honesty in the content. There is no possible way that anyone could know for a fact that these things you post are true, are whether are not they are exaggerated. I miss the days when phatmassers would post something and we would discuss and critique it, instead of everything popping up being claimed to be facts, by overzealous (not about Jesus, but about their anticatholic agenda) protestants. Oh and by the way you guys are VERY, VERY predictable. I can pretty much see the future when it come to your post. I hope this isn't your method of evangelization, because I know protestants who are a lot more successful with a more relaxed style.
Eutychus Posted September 10, 2006 Posted September 10, 2006 [quote]Oh and by the way you guys are VERY, VERY predictable. I can pretty much see the future when it come to your post. I hope this isn't your method of evangelization, because I know protestants who are a lot more successful with a more relaxed style. [/quote] For starters, I guess this is the fith time ... I'm NOT a Protestant. My church never left Rome, isn't protesting Rome, nor much cares one way or the other what the idol venerators and pretenders in petticoats do, teach, or misuse. That being said, and it needed to be said, you make the claim that we are predictable? Read over the TOPICS raised here. Frankly the only ones that are interesting seem to be raised by Budge. In my dealings with Catholics online, I generally find them to be the least interesting people, less interested in history, politics, and the like. But thank you for noticing anyway. It is gratifying to know that people notice you.
brandelynmarie Posted September 10, 2006 Posted September 10, 2006 [quote name='Aloysius' post='1059809' date='Sep 9 2006, 07:27 PM'] it's a desert oasis, not a desert island... [/quote] whoops! my bad!
Thy Geekdom Come Posted September 10, 2006 Posted September 10, 2006 [quote name='Budge' post='1059098' date='Sep 8 2006, 03:21 PM'] Ok you tell me the difference then. PRAY TOGETHER or TO BE TOGETHER AND PRAY. More straining of gnats from the Pharisees of confusion. All to fool you folks into universalism. [/quote] In the first, "together" is modifying the verb "pray." It is therefore acting adverbally. In the second, "together" is modifying the subject. It is therefore acting adjectivally. Therefore, in the first, the praying is done as one. In the second, the praying can be separate, but the people are together in physical proximity.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now