ardillacid Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 [quote name='bhrhrahraa' date='10 December 2009 - 02:39 PM' timestamp='1260473953' post='2017707'] How do you explain the billions of people following a "false religion?" Brainwashed? Oh really? For 1400 years these Muslims have been brainwashed? I never thought that was possible. [/quote] But billions of catholics have been brainwashed for 2000 years. Yeah, I pick up what you're laying down.
homeschoolmom Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 People-- CHILLAX... you are giving HSM a HEADACHE! (yes, I referred to myself in the third person... I'm tired...)
Vincent Vega Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 [quote name='bhrhrahraa' date='10 December 2009 - 02:39 PM' timestamp='1260473953' post='2017707'] How do you explain the billions of people following a "false religion?" Brainwashed? Oh really? For 1400 years these Muslims have been brainwashed? I never thought that was possible. [/quote] [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum"]Argumentum ad populum[/url] fallacy - just because many believe something does not make it true, be it Catholicism, Islam, or Santa Claus.
KnightofChrist Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 Good Advice, I think I'll go Homer Simpson on a box of donuts... Humm.... Donuts...
extempers Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 There are theological differences and then there are bigoted remarks full of hate, spite and lies that no sane bishop, at least in America, would stand for. I completely understand that some members cannot control their tongues, but it the job of the forum to moderate these members and edit/delete bigoted posts. If you do not, then well phatmass is nothing but a propagator of such bigotry and we have no reason to associate.
Nihil Obstat Posted December 10, 2009 Author Posted December 10, 2009 [quote name='extempers' date='10 December 2009 - 01:49 PM' timestamp='1260474540' post='2017733'] There are theological differences and then there are bigoted remarks full of hate, spite and lies that no sane bishop, at least in America, would stand for. I completely understand that some members cannot control their tongues, but it the job of the forum to moderate these members and edit/delete bigoted posts. If you do not, then well phatmass is nothing but a propagator of such bigotry and we have no reason to associate. [/quote] Wouldn't you prefer to address what you see as bigotry yourself, and let the truth stand on its own power?
homeschoolmom Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 I'm sure you know where the report button is since your phorum is laid out the exact same way...
extempers Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 [quote name='Nihil Obstat' date='10 December 2009 - 02:50 PM' timestamp='1260474612' post='2017734'] Wouldn't you prefer to address what you see as bigotry yourself, and let the truth stand on its own power? [/quote] Yes, let's have threads/posts discussing how asians have small eyes or a debate on whether blacks are humans or not? Let the truth stand on its on power! *sarcasm* [quote name='homeschoolmom' date='10 December 2009 - 02:50 PM' timestamp='1260474655' post='2017735'] I'm sure you know where the report button is since your phorum is laid out the exact same way... [/quote] This is not my forum. With all respect, I have seen you post on threads where it should be obvious moderation is needed and yet you did nothing. I wish I was being over-sensitive and our differences were solely based on rejection of each others religion, but it is not the case.
Nihil Obstat Posted December 10, 2009 Author Posted December 10, 2009 [quote name='extempers' date='10 December 2009 - 01:57 PM' timestamp='1260475039' post='2017737'] Yes, let's have threads/posts discussing how asians have small eyes or a debate on whether blacks are humans or not? Let the truth stand on its on power! *sarcasm* [/quote] If someone posted saying that black people are sub-human, I'd be more than happy to tell them exactly why they're an idiot. That position hasn't got a leg to stand on. The truth is so obvious that any thinking person can see it, based on both viewpoints being presented. Personally, I'm a big fan of free speech. I'd prefer things to be solved by people having respectful, public debates rather than some authority telling us what we can and cannot say. That being said, if you really find a post offensive, by all means report it. You're a member on Phatmass and you enjoy the same rights as any other member. Our mods are really awesome, but they're not omniscient, and they sometimes don't see offensive posts because of the sheer volume of posts in a single day.
homeschoolmom Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 [quote name='extempers' date='10 December 2009 - 02:57 PM' timestamp='1260475039' post='2017737']This is not my forum. With all respect, I have seen you post on threads where it should be obvious moderation is needed and yet you did nothing. I wish I was being over-sensitive and our differences were solely based on rejection of each others religion, but it is not the case. [/quote] I'm sorry you don't like the way we do things here. Our webmaster, dUSt, has given the moderators instruction to be as "hands off" as possible. Our edits are few and far between.
Apotheoun Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 [quote name='bhrhrahraa' date='10 December 2009 - 12:39 PM' timestamp='1260473953' post='2017707'] How do you explain the billions of people following a "false religion?" Brainwashed? [/quote] How can you explain the millions of people who follow the teachings of Joseph Smith? Clearly, millions of people will believe almost anything if they like what they hear.
Maggyie Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 (edited) I'm so depressed by this. Clearly both Islam and Christianity contain people who don't know how to conduct themselves as guests or as hosts. I'm assuming their approaches would be totally different face to face, I assume they would't say to a Muslim they met for the first time at a cocktail party, "if only Islam were a growth on someone's face, then it could be gotten rid of." Because people are supposed to have manners. And to pass it off as "well, I'm just speaking the hard Truth" is a horrible abuse of our faith. The Gospel offers a challenge to everyone, it is not an excuse to go around being nasty to people. Edited December 10, 2009 by Maggie
HisChildForever Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 [quote name='Maggie' date='10 December 2009 - 03:13 PM' timestamp='1260476003' post='2017747'] The Gospel offers a challenge to everyone, it is not an excuse to go around being nasty to people. [/quote] As Apo has already stated, the Christians arguing with the Muslims are attacking Islam. The Muslims arguing with the Christians are using personal attacks against one's character.
Apotheoun Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 I must admit that I have been taken aback by the number of Catholic Phatmassers who speak about Islam as if it were just a [i]sui juris[/i] Church within the Catholic Church. It is one thing to love Muslims, as religiously misguided as they are, but quite another to express love for and defend an ideology (i.e. Islam) that involves the explicit denial of the dogmas of the Trinity and the Incarnation.
KnightofChrist Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 [quote name='Apotheoun' date='10 December 2009 - 03:21 PM' timestamp='1260476496' post='2017750'] I must admit that I have been taken aback by the number of Catholic Phatmassers who speak about Islam as if it were just a [i]sui juris[/i] Church within the Catholic Church. It is one thing to love Muslims, as religiously misguided as they are, but quite another to express love for and defend an ideology (i.e. Islam) that involves the explicit denial of the dogmas of the Trinity and the Incarnation. [/quote] We live in a world where Men can not be Men anymore, and Adults can not speak as Adults with reason. Where speaking truth with conviction is slammed anytime one dares speak up. Everything is got to be I feel, I think, maybe, like, sorta, kinda, question marks on statements and other such nonsense. SPEAK WITH CONVICTION By Taylor Mali Watch it here... http://www.vimeo.com/3829682 In case you hadn't noticed, it has somehow become uncool to sound like you know what you're talking about? Or believe strongly in what you're saying? Invisible question marks and parenthetical (you know?)'s have been attaching themselves to the ends of our sentences? Even when those sentences aren't, like, questions? You know? Declarative sentences - so-called because they used to, like, DECLARE things to be true as opposed to other things which were, like, not - have been infected by a totally hip and tragically cool interrogative tone? You know? Like, don't think I'm uncool just because I've noticed this; this is just like the word on the street, you know? It's like what I've heard? I have nothing personally invested in my own opinions, okay? I'm just inviting you to join me in my uncertainty? What has happened to our conviction? Where are the limbs out on which we once walked? Have they been, like, chopped down with the rest of the rain forest? Or do we have, like, nothing to say? Has society become so, like, totally . . . I mean absolutely . . . You know? That we've just gotten to the point where it's just, like . . . whatever! And so actually our disarticulation . . . ness is just a clever sort of . . . thing to disguise the fact that we've become the most aggressively inarticulate generation to come along since . . . you know, a long, long time ago! I entreat you, I implore you, I exhort you, I challenge you: To speak with conviction. To say what you believe in a manner that bespeaks the determination with which you believe it. Because contrary to the wisdom of the bumper sticker, it is not enough these days to simply QUESTION AUTHORITY. You have to speak with it, too.
Nihil Obstat Posted December 10, 2009 Author Posted December 10, 2009 I'd prefer if we stuck within a very narrow interpretation of 'on topic' in this thread in particular.
Apotheoun Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 (edited) [quote name='Nihil Obstat' date='10 December 2009 - 01:54 PM' timestamp='1260478461' post='2017768'] I'd prefer if we stuck within a very narrow interpretation of 'on topic' in this thread in particular. [/quote] Most of the posts have been on topic . . . unless you are just expecting people to re-post what you said. Edited December 10, 2009 by Apotheoun
Apotheoun Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 [quote name='Nihil Obstat' date='10 December 2009 - 02:03 PM' timestamp='1260479037' post='2017775'] That would get boring. [/quote] Yes, it would.
extempers Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 [quote name='Nihil Obstat' date='10 December 2009 - 03:02 PM' timestamp='1260475324' post='2017739'] If someone posted saying that black people are sub-human, I'd be more than happy to tell them exactly why they're an idiot. That position hasn't got a leg to stand on. The truth is so obvious that any thinking person can see it, based on both viewpoints being presented. Personally, I'm a big fan of free speech. I'd prefer things to be solved by people having respectful, public debates rather than some authority telling us what we can and cannot say. That being said, if you really find a post offensive, by all means report it. You're a member on Phatmass and you enjoy the same rights as any other member. Our mods are really awesome, but they're not omniscient, and they sometimes don't see offensive posts because of the sheer volume of posts in a single day. [/quote] So are you ok with a naked Jesus made of chocolate on display for "art"? I'm not (and yes it happened). Freedom of speech has its limits. There are debates to be had and then there are debates that should be shunned. You should not give a medium to such hatred. And if I'm to accept your premise, that you publicly debate them, then where are the debates? Rather you have topics with hate and lies being propagated with little to no argument against them. Even worse, you have posts praising bigoted posts! Where is the outrage? Where is the condemnation? It's amazing how Muslims are asked to do this and do that and bend over backwards for the sake of speaking out against that which is "bad", but no call upon the Christians. I spent over an hour discussing the complexity of the Imam Anwar case and I'm being called out because of it and yet you have "idiotic" posts talking about growths on Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him!) and instead of outrage it is met with praise. I specifically quoted both posts and instead of moderation, I was told this is a colorful site. Yah very colorful... But it's not my site, I will not report on this forum. You guys are free to do whatever you like. I'm just glad we as Muslims on MM have much more control and respect. [quote name='homeschoolmom' date='10 December 2009 - 03:02 PM' timestamp='1260475343' post='2017740'] I'm sorry you don't like the way we do things here. Our webmaster, dUSt, has given the moderators instruction to be as "hands off" as possible. Our edits are few and far between. [/quote] Hands off bigotry? Not exactly a Christian principle. It's not like I'm asking you to be respectful, but how about editing statements that one wouldn't be allowed to say even in a very liberal and open minded university class. Is that really that much too ask? Allahu Alim, What else is to be expected.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now