fides' Jack Posted April 12, 2023 Author Posted April 12, 2023 https://gloria.tv/post/9PXPYxkkpJ4c3wya12AoBFgBH People who took the first dose or two but did not take additional boosters are the most at risk of dying from the covid shots.
little2add Posted April 13, 2023 Posted April 13, 2023 On 4/12/2023 at 8:26 AM, fides' Jack said: https://gloria.tv/post/9PXPYxkkpJ4c3wya12AoBFgBH People who took the first dose or two but did not take additional boosters are the most at risk of dying from the covid shots. bull
chrysostom Posted April 20, 2023 Posted April 20, 2023 On 11/26/2022 at 7:21 PM, mommas_boy said: Had everyone been vaccinated immediately (even if people were willing, this would still have been a logistical nightmare, especially in third-world countries which represent a sizable reservoir of virus), the virus would have stopped mutating and evolving. Unfortunately, some people chose not to get vaccinated, and others could not be vaccinated due to logistical constraints. The link between vaccine uptake and observed limit of spread and mortality is incredibly tenuous. So I find that "would have" claim pretty tenuous as well.
fides' Jack Posted May 23, 2023 Author Posted May 23, 2023 (edited) Finally, some semblance of sanity: Croatia publicly declares WHO a terrorist organization. Edited May 23, 2023 by fides' Jack
Nunsuch Posted May 23, 2023 Posted May 23, 2023 1 hour ago, fides' Jack said: Finally, some semblance of sanity: Croatia publicly declares WHO a terrorist organization. "Croatia" didn't do this. One, evidently wacky, individual did so, albeit a member of the European Parliament. Just as you have here--and with about as much credence.
fides' Jack Posted May 23, 2023 Author Posted May 23, 2023 (edited) 14 hours ago, Nunsuch said: "Croatia" didn't do this. One, evidently wacky, individual did so, albeit a member of the European Parliament. Your correction is warranted. Still, it's evidence of sanity in an otherwise insane world. God bless him! Edited May 23, 2023 by fides' Jack
little2add Posted June 9, 2023 Posted June 9, 2023 06/05/23 NEWS The Food and Drug Administration announced Thursday it will restrict the use of the Johnson & Johnson one-shot COVID-19 vaccine after an investigation revealed that those who got the jab were at increased risk of developing life-threatening blood clots. The decision comes following an investigation into reports of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) - a rare and potentially life-threatening disease that creates blood clots and creates low levels of blood platelets - from those who have received the vaccine.
Didacus Posted August 8, 2023 Posted August 8, 2023 On 6/12/2023 at 5:29 AM, little2add said: That in itself is a coincidence is it not?
little2add Posted September 4, 2023 Posted September 4, 2023 Fauci admits to lack of COVID mask evidence — but wants us to wear them anyway https://nypost.com/2023/09/02/fauci-admits-lack-of-covid-mask-evidence-but-still-wants-us-to-wear-them/
fides' Jack Posted September 18, 2023 Author Posted September 18, 2023 (edited) This doctor is actually quite pro-vaccine, and even pro-mRNA-vaccine - even despite the evidence he brings forth. I don't doubt his credentials. The video is half an hour long, but is well worth watching/listening to. The lack of an official way for him to move forward with this, outside of email/twitter, is scary (this is discussed ~@24:30). We lay citizens assume there are procedures and policies in place for people like this to go to when there is a problem, and because nothing comes forward very publicly we assume there is no problem whatsoever. We are naïve. For your informational pleasure: Edited September 18, 2023 by fides' Jack
Didacus Posted October 12, 2023 Posted October 12, 2023 (edited) Was it not the Premier of Alberta who recently apologized to all the unvaxed? Canadian Leader apologizes Edited October 12, 2023 by Didacus
fides' Jack Posted December 1, 2023 Author Posted December 1, 2023 (edited) Texas sues Pfizer: https://www.pro-memoria.info/wp/wp-content/uploads/Causa_-Texas-lawsuit-against-Pfizer-over-covid-19-vaccine-_Ken-Paxton-procuratore-generale-del-Texas.pdf From the lawsuit: (a strikethrough seemed to be added from what I copy/pasted that ruined the rest of the post. I can't seem to get rid of it.) Quote … Contrary to Pfizer’s public statements, however, the pandemic did not end; it got worse … More Americans died in 2021, with Pfizer’s vaccine available, than in 2020, the first year of the pandemic … a greater percentage of the vaccinated were dying from COVID-19 than the unvaccinated … Pfizer’s vaccine plainly was not “95% effective.” … In a nutshell, Pfizer deceived the public … 95% efficacy against infection was highly misleading from day one … it represented a calculation of the so-called “relative risk reduction” … FDA publications indicate “relative risk reduction” is a misleading statistic that “unduly influence" consumer choice ...How did Pfizer respond when it became apparent that its vaccine was failing? … By intimidating those spreading the truth, and by conspiring to censor the vaccine’s critics … Pfizer labeled as “criminals” those who spread facts about the vaccine … It accused them of spreading “misinformation.” … it coerced social media platforms to silence prominent truth-tellers … even went so far as to request that social media platforms silence a former FDA director because his comments could “driv[e] news coverage” critical of the vaccine … In summary, Pfizer intentionally misrepresented the efficacy of its COVID-19 vaccine … and censored persons who threatened to disseminate the truth … the absolute risk reduction for defined COVID-19 cases was only 0.85% … a vaccine’s absolute risk reduction is determined by subtracting the post- treatment risk rate from the baseline risk rate … Using Pfizer’s Phase 2/3 data, this calculation is performed by subtracting the post-treatment risk rate of 0.04% (8/17,411 persons) found in the vaccine group … from the baseline risk rate of 0.9% (162/17,511 persons) found in the placebo group … which after rounding yields 0.85% … Bourla … claiming that the vaccine prevented COVID-19 full stop and would end the global pandemic … Pfizer’s misleading statements created the false impression that 95% of vaccine recipients would never obtain COVID-19, full stop … February 2021 … Bourla responded that “at 6 months, the protection is robust.” … At this time, however, Pfizer’s clinical trial data had not yet even collected six months of post- vaccination data for its participants … Pfizer misrepresented that vaccination against COVID-19 prevented “transmission” between persons … including from vaccinated persons with symptomatic or asymptomatic COVID-19 infections … Pfizer misrepresented that its vaccine had substantial efficacy against COVID-19 variants—in particular, the Delta variant I added emphasis on the points I find to be highly troubling. But really every single point here is criminal. Are people awake yet? Would you still take the shot? Edited December 1, 2023 by fides' Jack
Didacus Posted December 1, 2023 Posted December 1, 2023 Seems everything is unravelling... Conspiracy theorist: 15, sheeps: 0
fides' Jack Posted December 2, 2023 Author Posted December 2, 2023 Coming out of New Zealand: https://rumble.com/v3ynskd-operation-m.o.a.r-mother-of-all-revelations.html In some instances, they are claiming as many as 30% of those who took the Pfizer shot are now dead. Statisticians say the odds that it's not the shot killing these people are 100 billion to 1, which is considerably less likely than you winning the Powerball. Is everyone awake yet?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now