Theoketos Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 (edited) [quote name='hot stuff' date='Aug 3 2005, 09:54 AM']I believe, (and I need to go back and look up my references) that the Canon Law is in respect to couples that marry without the knowledge that one or both of the couple is infertile. That marrying under these pretenses does not invalidate or annul the marriage. However, (and again I need to look this up) I do know that there are cases where couples were not allowed to marry because the fiance was wounded in war. They new that they would never be able to bear children and the Church refused to allow the sacrament. [right][snapback]669802[/snapback][/right] [/quote] That may be a true story, but I wonder if this wound also would not allow for consumation...(which would in affect not allow for procreation). And I imagine it really rather hard to suffer such a wound that would render one infertile without being impotent. And I just re-read that whole section and there is nothing about fertility or rather infertility being an impediment. Edited August 3, 2005 by Theoketos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noel's angel Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 actually, i think hot stuff is incorrect in his statement. There was a thread a while back where this was discussed. Again, using the example of my cousin-she knew she could'nt have children, she got married, and now has two kids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noel's angel Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 [quote name='Norseman82' date='Aug 3 2005, 03:56 PM']Ask Strom Thurmond or James Doohan.... [right][snapback]669807[/snapback][/right] [/quote] I said that earlier as well, but it was dismissed I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theoketos Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 It is so frustrating to properally quote Canon Law and have generally open minded people not listen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noel's angel Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 I hear ya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homeschoolmom Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 [quote name='Mrs. Bro. Adam' date='Aug 3 2005, 08:02 AM']He was also more her guardian than her husband. [right][snapback]669686[/snapback][/right] [/quote] No, he was her husband. Even though he didn't have marital relations with her, doesn't make him less of her husband. (A man can be guardian to many people but only husband to one.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carrie Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 [quote name='Theoketos' date='Aug 3 2005, 11:57 AM']That may be a true story, but I wonder if this wound also would not allow for consumation...(which would in affect not allow for procreation). [right][snapback]669810[/snapback][/right] [/quote] This is my thought as well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deeds Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 (edited) Back to the original topic... it depends on the ages of the couple involved. I'm 21 later this month and my boyfriend is 28. I think that difference is ok at our age, but would be too much if I was 16. I do think it's dodgy though when you see rich middle-aged men going out with women young enough to be their daughter. Edited August 3, 2005 by Deeds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Adam Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 [quote name='Carrie' date='Aug 3 2005, 10:55 AM']Yes, I said all things are possible if God wills it. You seem to forget that little part. God does not and will never will same sex unions. Your argument does not hold water Adam. [right][snapback]669804[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Thank you for proving my argument! That is what I said originally and you dismissed it originally but now it just came out of your own mouth (err...keyboard). All things are possible with God, but not all things are in the will of God. God very well may not will a 108 year old man and a 16 year old girl to get married. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homeschoolmom Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 [quote name='hot stuff' date='Aug 3 2005, 09:33 AM']For argument's sake, with that logic alone, two 60 year olds would not be allowed to marry. [right][snapback]669764[/snapback][/right] [/quote] That's what I was going to say... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaime Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 Hey you could be right about the interpretion Theo. I am trying to remember stuff from 20 years ago. The cursory research that I'm doing during this discussion isn't backing me up at all! stupid patch grumble grumble grumble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homeschoolmom Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 [quote name='Brother Adam' date='Aug 3 2005, 10:07 AM']God very well may not will a 108 year old man and a 16 year old girl to get married. [right][snapback]669828[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Then again, he may... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carrie Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 [quote name='Brother Adam' date='Aug 3 2005, 12:07 PM']Thank you for proving my argument! That is what I said originally and you dismissed it originally but now it just came out of your own mouth (err...keyboard). All things are possible with God, but not all things are in the will of God. God very well may not will a 108 year old man and a 16 year old girl to get married. [right][snapback]669828[/snapback][/right] [/quote] He very well might, so I've not proved your point at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaime Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 [quote name='homeschoolmom' date='Aug 3 2005, 10:10 AM']Then again, he may... [right][snapback]669831[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Why do you have to bring up Anna Nicole Smith's prom picture? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Adam Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 I've entirely proved my point, you just don't seem to know what it is. I just spoke with a diocesian canon lawyer for the diocese of Grand Rapids, and she mentioned that the Church would very likely not approve the marriage 'of a 108 year old man to a 16 year old girl", but that it depends on the circumstances involved. She liked 'generational' idea and thought it was ideal, but agreed there are exceptional circumstances when two people of an even wider age gap could get married. She mentioned if a woman has gone though menopause they likely would not be admitted to marriage. She's going to write a more indepth email for me when she has time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now