RezaMikhaeil Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 (edited) I reciently [within the last 6 months if I'm not mistaken] ran into a girl that said she belonged to a Christmatic Catholic Church. She gave me information that suggested that it wasn't against the philosphy of the Roman Catholic Church, what's everyone's thought regarding this? I'm Orthodox as everyone knows and the Orthodox Churchs, both Oriental and Eastern, have taken a pretty clear stance on this, but I'm not sure if the Roman Catholic is in agreement. Reza Edited May 12, 2009 by RezaLemmyng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fides quarens intellectum Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 Hi, Reza! I'm not sure what specifically you are having a concern/question about, but i do know there are some resident Phatmassers who have been involved in the Charismatic movement within the Church, so they may see this and chime in. In the meantime, we've had a few threads about it in the past: [url="http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/index.php?showtopic=83286"]Spiritual Gifts thread from Open Mic[/url] [url="http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/index.php?showtopic=71159"]Charismatic Movement - from Open Mic[/url] There are other threads, too. As for your friend, though, this is the first time i've ever heard of a "Christmatic Catholic Church." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RezaMikhaeil Posted May 12, 2009 Author Share Posted May 12, 2009 [quote name='fides quarens intellectum' post='1865150' date='May 12 2009, 10:07 AM']Hi, Reza! I'm not sure what specifically you are having a concern/question about, but i do know there are some resident Phatmassers who have been involved in the Charismatic movement within the Church, so they may see this and chime in. In the meantime, we've had a few threads about it in the past: [url="http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/index.php?showtopic=83286"]Spiritual Gifts thread from Open Mic[/url] [url="http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/index.php?showtopic=71159"]Charismatic Movement - from Open Mic[/url] There are other threads, too. As for your friend, though, this is the first time i've ever heard of a "Christmatic Catholic Church." [/quote] I may have mis-written that at midnight, she was catholic, but her catholic church was considering "charismatic catholic", and it just kinda struck me as "different"...thanks for the link thou. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 [quote name='RezaLemmyng' post='1864834' date='May 11 2009, 11:22 PM']I'm Orthodox as everyone knows and the Orthodox Churchs, both Oriental and Eastern, have taken a pretty clear stance on this, but I'm not sure if the Roman Catholic is in agreement. Reza[/quote] I share your concerns about the charismatic movement. God grant you many joyful years! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggamafu Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 (edited) Whereas the gift of tongues at Pentecost represented a reversal of Babel, the novel "gift of tongues" that has appeared so recently seems to represent a reinstitution of Babel. The most I've seen for biblical support of glossolalia is the reference to "tongues of angels" and another reference to "groans of the Holy Spirit". Neither of these references must necessarily be interpreted to mean the incoherent babbling of glossolalia (a phenomenon that we see elsewhere in extremely pagan / primitive religions). And indeed it would seem that the Fathers saw tongues as strictly the gift of linguistics, from what I remember. Tongues is the only gift that we are told would cease. St. Augustine thought that this cessation had occurred in his day. I also have concerns that all of these gifts of the new "charismatic" movement serve to foster elitism and self-righteousness. HAVING SAID ALL OF THAT: It is difficult to deny the fruit of the charismatic movement. I have been told (though I did not check this for myself) that the number one parish in the nation for vocations is charismatic (out of Ann Arbor) and so is the number two parish (out of Dallas). And I can personally testify to the vibrancy and majority-devotion of the single charismatic parish in my area. Their kids are excited about their faith, which says a lot. And other than their permission to insert a period of charismatic "worship" into the Mass, they are very strict in their adherence to the rubrics of the Latin-rite Novus Ordo. So what can I say? Can Satan cast out Satan? I am left with the general feeling that even if this new charismaticism is not of holy supernatural origins, neither is it of unholy supernatural origins. Perhaps glossolalia and the other "gifts" are strictly products of human psychology / silliness. Edited May 12, 2009 by Ziggamafu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RezaMikhaeil Posted May 12, 2009 Author Share Posted May 12, 2009 The problem that I have with this idea that the fruit of the charismatic movement is substanial is that the fruit is also accompanied by many heresies including false prophesy [a grave sin]. We're told that Saints, such as the Desert Fathers, were amongst the most Holy that the earth has ever seen, yet there is no recording of them having spoken in such a tongue. However, the Desert Fathers, fruit, if compared to the Charismatic Movement, blew their out of the water. The Desert Fathers raised people from the dead, I have yet to see a credible instance, where the Chrismatics have done that! Chrismatics, such as Benny Hinn, sadly are eager to prove themselves by falsifying such miracles. The Desert Fathers were also slow to display miracels that had came through them, and were even slower with their tongue. Even more evidence is in the fact that nobody saw the fruits of the desert fathers blended with heresy. Reza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RezaMikhaeil Posted May 12, 2009 Author Share Posted May 12, 2009 [quote name='Apotheoun' post='1865262' date='May 12 2009, 10:41 AM']I share your concerns about the charismatic movement. God grant you many joyful years![/quote] May Joyful years to you too my friend! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintOlaf Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 [quote name='RezaLemmyng' post='1865410' date='May 12 2009, 04:49 PM']The problem that I have with this idea that the fruit of the charismatic movement is substanial is that the fruit is also accompanied by many heresies including false prophesy [a grave sin].[/quote] Not to nitpick you, but you continually assume that false prophecy is something that accompanies all of the modern charismatic gifts. I would like to see some proof of this. I explained in the other thread about private revelation and how one needs to be able to separate the private revelation from dogma. If hearing a group praying in tongues makes you uncomfortable then dismiss yourself from their presence, but don't automatically condemn them with accusations of false prophecy without proof to back it up. The charismatic parish that I attend is very down to earth and when at a prayer meeting (not in the liturgy) a prophesy is heard, the faithful are reminded that it is a private revelation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 I expressed my views on the [i]Charismatic Movement[/i] in a thread some years ago, and I haven't really changed my position since that time: [url="http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/index.php?s=&showtopic=50528&view=findpost&p=943350"][b][u]In a debate, quick...[/u][/b][/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RezaMikhaeil Posted May 12, 2009 Author Share Posted May 12, 2009 [quote name='SaintOlaf' post='1865488' date='May 12 2009, 03:32 PM']Not to nitpick you, but you continually assume that false prophecy is something that accompanies all of the modern charismatic gifts. I would like to see some proof of this. I explained in the other thread about private revelation and how one needs to be able to separate the private revelation from dogma. If hearing a group praying in tongues makes you uncomfortable then dismiss yourself from their presence, but don't automatically condemn them with accusations of false prophecy without proof to back it up. The charismatic parish that I attend is very down to earth and when at a prayer meeting (not in the liturgy) a prophesy is heard, the faithful are reminded that it is a private revelation.[/quote] First if they were speaking in tongues without interpretation, that goes against the scriptures, but it has nothing to do with me feeling "uncomfortable", rather many of my relatives are charismatics, before I'd gone into foster care, I'd attended a charismatic church. The issue isn't that, I'd...on my own accounts, witnessed many false prophesies. IE: A woman once claimed to have prophesied over me saying that I was goiing to be a mighty prophet as an adult. I'm an adult now and not a prophet, so that's a false prophesy. That's just but a single example, I have millions from all different Charismatic groups. Even those examples are not what made my mind up on the issue, what made my mind up was the proof that I'd given above. Following the Path of the Saints is what we should be encouraging. Reza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RezaMikhaeil Posted May 12, 2009 Author Share Posted May 12, 2009 [quote name='Apotheoun' post='1865501' date='May 12 2009, 03:45 PM']I expressed my views on the [i]Charismatic Movement[/i] in a thread some years ago, and I haven't really changed my position since that time: [url="http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/index.php?s=&showtopic=50528&view=findpost&p=943350"][b][u]In a debate, quick...[/u][/b][/url][/quote] What you wrote there is almost identical to what His Holiness Pope Shenouda III [Coptic Patriarch] wrote in his book, "comparative theology" [http://tasbeha.org/content/hh_books/Comptheo/index.html]. [quote]One of the fathers said: "If God gives you a gift, ask Him to give you humility with it to protect it, or ask Him to take this gift from you."[/quote] Charismatics say that they've "recieved the baptism of the holy spirit", yet in liturgy is that not given? [quote]But to grant the Holy Spirit is the task of the clergymen, first practised by the Apostles by the lying on of hands, then by the clergymen in the Sacrament of Chrismation. We receive the Holy Spirit in the Sacrament of Chrismation (Confirmation) after the Sacrament of Baptism. The Holy Bible mentions this Anointing in (1 John.2: 20,27) and mentions the laying on of hands by the Apostles in (Acts 8: 14-17). The authority to grant the Holy Spirit, which was the Apostles' and then their successors', is claimed today by youth and laity who commend the Holy Spirit to others to let them be filled with the Holy Spirit and speak with tongues![/quote] Most Charismatics pray for gifts, such as speaking in tongues. [quote]In our Orthodox theology, whoever receives a gift tries to hide it, as did Bishop St. Serapion who had the gift of healing, and many other saints. Are gifts granted or are they requested? God endows whatever gift He wishes to whomever He wishes in the time His Divine Wisdom defines, according to His words: "The kingdom of God does not come with observation" (Lk.17: 20). Gifts are like the wind that blows wherever it wishes, "as God has dealt to each one a measure of faith" (Rom.12: 3). Why are gifts prayed for, then? And why the gift of Speaking in tongues in particular?[/quote] Those that claim to speak in tongues do so for self edification [even according to their own written documents]. I can't count the number of times I'd heard charismatics say, "its a private spiritual language" or a "prayer language" betwee them and God. This is what is in their own liturature, yet the the same Biblical scriptures that they claim support their practice [which it doesn't if interpreted correctly] says that tongues are for non-believers, not believers. [quote]Speaking in tongues is a sign for unbelievers In the Apostle's opinion, believers will benefit from forthtelling, whereas unbelievers will profit from the tongues provided that they are interpreted. He says: "Therefore tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers; but prophesying is not for unbelievers but for those who believe" (v.22). Therefore if those who are present in church are believers, what is the benefit of Speaking in tongues, according to the Apostle's teaching?[/quote] We know that the Eucharist can save people, putting life into them. [quote]Many people lost their salvation and perished despite their possession of spiritual gifts The gifts did not help them and did not save them. Thus the Lord says: "Many will say to Me in that day, `Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?' And then I will declare to them, `I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practise lawlessness!' " (Matt.7: 22,23)[/quote] There is many more good points of his book, but these are key points that I thought were similiar to your own post, which was great! Sadly, I find that most Charismatics don't seem to be able to support their position with the Earliest of Saints, or even the scriptures themselves. Reza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 (edited) Peace My homeboy SaintWannabe is involved with the Charismatic Movement and I hope he chimes in. I sorta find this thread disrespectfull to him though and dont blame him if he doesn't respond. Godbless. Edited May 13, 2009 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MStar Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 Two threads on Charismatic stuff! I very much enjoy this topic. And I hope SaintWannabe gets involved too DelieveryBoy, although I don't see why it would be disrespectful to him, I'm sure RezaLemmyng isn't aiming it at anyone. Anyhoo...what about this verse in 1 Cor. 12:31 when St. Paul, discussing the charisms, says "But strive for the greater gifts." (other translations I've seen say "eagerly desire"). Paul expected these gifts to exist in the community. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RezaMikhaeil Posted May 13, 2009 Author Share Posted May 13, 2009 [quote name='MStar' post='1865665' date='May 12 2009, 06:33 PM']Two threads on Charismatic stuff! I very much enjoy this topic. And I hope SaintWannabe gets involved too DelieveryBoy, although I don't see why it would be disrespectful to him, I'm sure RezaLemmyng isn't aiming it at anyone. Anyhoo...what about this verse in 1 Cor. 12:31 when St. Paul, discussing the charisms, says "But strive for the greater gifts." (other translations I've seen say "eagerly desire"). Paul expected these gifts to exist in the community.[/quote] Yeah I'm not trying to be disrespectful, but of course I have my opinions, as do others. In regards to 1 Cor. 12:31, I don't see this as proving the Charismatic gifts, but rather order of spiritual gifts that were found amongst the Saints and recorded in our thousands of years of history. Higher gifts would be to love, as the writing goes on to say... [quote]The Spiritual Gifts and the Gift of Tongues Some of our Protestant brethren cling to the spiritual gifts and strive to attain them as privileges of being God's children and heirs. They put before them the verse: "But earnestly desire the best gifts", without taking into account the completion of the verse: "And yet I show you a more excellent way," (1Cor.12: 31). While they give great importance to the gift of Speaking in tongues, they disregard that immediately after this verse the Apostle Paul says: "Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become as sounding brass or a clanging cymbal" (1Cor.13: 1). The Apostle is explaining how love is preferred to all the gifts. The fruit of the Spirit is more important for your salvation than the gifts of the Spirit St. Paul the Apostle talked about the fruit of the Spirit, saying: "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control" (Gal.5: 22,23). The Apostle Paul said that love, which is the first fruit of the Spirit, is greater than faith that can move mountains (1 Cor.13: 2,13). And the Lord said about love: "On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets" (Matt.22: 40). When the disciples returned to the Lord Jesus joyful over gifts, He said to them: "Nevertheless, do not rejoice in this, 138 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- that the spirits are subject to you, but rather rejoice because your names are written in heaven" (Lk.10: 20).[/quote] I think the part that we dispute is weather the scriptures of 1 Corinthians testify of the charismatic doctrines, "baptism of the holy spirit" [etc]. I don't believe that they testify of such, but rather people interpret them as such. [quote]But to grant the Holy Spirit is the task of the clergymen, first practised by the Apostles by the lying on of hands, then by the clergymen in the Sacrament of Chrismation. We receive the Holy Spirit in the Sacrament of Chrismation (Confirmation) after the Sacrament of Baptism. The Holy Bible mentions this Anointing in (1 John.2: 20,27) and mentions the laying on of hands by the Apostles in (Acts 8: 14-17). The authority to grant the Holy Spirit, which was the Apostles' and then their successors', is claimed today by youth and laity who commend the Holy Spirit to others to let them be filled with the Holy Spirit and speak with tongues![/quote] I'd heard these scriptures quoted by people that believe in "the baptism of the holy spirit" [charismatic interpretation], as to say that it's refering to that. Yet according to the Orthodox doctrines [and I'm pretty sure the Roman Catholic Doctrines], its referencing Christmation/Confirmation. I'd heard the phrase used, "I recieved the baptism of the holy spirit", yet we're taught in true orthodoxy [roman and eastern], that we recieve the Holy Spirt in Christmation, so I find it incompatible that we could recieve it again. [quote]The Apostle says: "For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my understanding is unfruitful" (v.14). The Apostle could see that this state should be completed by understanding. The person should pray in spirit and also with understanding; sing in spirit and also with understanding. Although the Apostle mentions the phrase `edifies himself' very cautiously and with remarks, and points out that it is not a complete edification, yet for the sake of edification he says: "I thank my God I speak with tongues more than you all; yet in the church I would rather speak five words with my understanding, that I may teach others also, than ten thousand words in a tongue" (vv.18, 19). Therefore there is no need for people to strive with all their might to speak with tongues, believing that this is a great achievement. If this is the case of Speaking in tongues as a gift of the Holy Spirit, what then shall we say when some people claim to speak with tongues and we are not certain of the genuineness of their claim?[/quote] [quote](7) Speaking in tongues is a sign for unbelievers In the Apostle's opinion, believers will benefit from forthtelling, whereas unbelievers will profit from the tongues provided that they are interpreted. He says: "Therefore tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers; but prophesying is not for unbelievers but for those who believe" (v.22). Therefore if those who are present in church are believers, what is the benefit of Speaking in tongues, according to the Apostle's teaching?[/quote] If tongues is a sign for unbelievers, then why would believers partake in it, and where does the "prayer language" concept fall into place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintwannabe 777 Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 [quote name='RezaLemmyng' post='1865589' date='May 12 2009, 06:58 PM']What you wrote there is almost identical to what His Holiness Pope Shenouda III [Coptic Patriarch] wrote in his book, "comparative theology" [http://tasbeha.org/content/hh_books/Comptheo/index.html]. Charismatics say that they've "recieved the baptism of the holy spirit", yet in liturgy is that not given? Baptism of the holy spirit is different than Baptism itself. It is a movement of the Holy Spirit that opens up the possibility for a closer relationship with God. Most Charismatics pray for gifts, such as speaking in tongues. Those that claim to speak in tongues do so for self edification [even according to their own written documents]. I can't count the number of times I'd heard charismatics say, "its a private spiritual language" or a "prayer language" betwee them and God. This is what is in their own liturature, yet the the same Biblical scriptures that they claim support their practice [which it doesn't if interpreted correctly] says that tongues are for non-believers, not believers. This is once again wrong because St. Paul often causes this the angelic language. I have heard people pray in languages that are "real" such as spanish, chinese, and Arabic. I know these people didn't know the language before then. Tongues can be for self-edification but when done in a group or when interpreted it can be powerful prayer. We know that the Eucharist can save people, putting life into them. There is many more good points of his book, but these are key points that I thought were similiar to your own post, which was great! Sadly, I find that most Charismatics don't seem to be able to support their position with the Earliest of Saints, or even the scriptures themselves. Reza[/quote] This is wrong, because St. Peter Prophesied, St. Paul spoke in tongues, the Cure D'Ars spoke in tongues, St. Padre Pio, was Charismatic, I can fnd more if you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now