Selah Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 What the heck, people? I thought I killed this thread. I give up. If listening to yoko ono asking satan to get naked can't stop this, nothing can. As you were. *pouts*
Selah Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 I never said that and you know it. Just because there is more to marriage than sex, one cannot deny the sexual aspect of marriage, otherwise it's not a marriage but rather a couple living as "brother and sister". Hell, early Christians used to do this all the time. Eastern Christians still do it. I rather like their view of marriage, that it isn't one big, "lol we haz ringz nao, let's do the nasty!" (last post, seriously)
BG45 Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 Hell, early Christians used to do this all the time. Eastern Christians still do it. I rather like their view of marriage, that it isn't one big, "lol we haz ringz nao, let's do the nasty!" (last post, seriously) Saint Cecilia comes to mind. She was married to Valerian of Trastevere by her patrician Christian parents. She converted him and his brother, remaining a married virgin until her death being martyred by the Romans.
CatholicsAreKewl Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 What the heck, people? I thought I killed this thread. I give up. If listening to yoko ono asking satan to get naked can't stop this, nothing can. As you were. *pouts* CatholicsareKewl: 1 Selah: 0
havok579257 Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 I never said that and you know it. Just because there is more to marriage than sex, one cannot deny the sexual aspect of marriage, otherwise it's not a marriage but rather a couple living as "brother and sister". I never said you said anything, I simply said its a good question. So I am awaiting your answer.
Norseman82 Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 I never said you said anything, I simply said its a good question. So I am awaiting your answer. Ask the Author, not me. I'm not the one who wrote it, i'm just relaying the message.
havok579257 Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 Ask the Author, not me. I'm not the one who wrote it, i'm just relaying the message. Avoiding the question. SO I see how hypocritical you are. You demand answers to your questions but refuse to answer other's questions. Nice.
havok579257 Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 Ask the Author, not me. I'm not the one who wrote it, i'm just relaying the message. Avoiding the question. SO I see how hypocritical you are. You demand answers to your questions but refuse to answer other's questions. Nice.
Apotheoun Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 also: why are we still beating this dead horse? isn't that cruelty to animals or some such thing? or desecration of a body? (or does that only apply to human bodies?) I must agree. This thread really seems lame. It makes me miss Budge's "debate" threads.
Freedom Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 I had some opportunities to loose my virginity before, but I did not act on them. You're awesome!
PhuturePriest Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 I find this post to be very rude. If there is anyone who needs therapy, it is you, because with this rudeness and crankiness at age 25 I fear for anyone whom you will minister to. "Back in the day" virginity was a higher priority than it is today. Notice also that back then we did not have the high rates of promiscuity and cohabitation as we do today (or at least it was not as open or socially accepted). Correlation? I think so in the sense that we have lowered our standards on sexual morality. It's sadder that this lowering of standards has crept into the religious as well; however, it was estimated that the majority of clergy subscribed to the Arian heresy in the 300s, so I guess nothing should surprise me. I do wonder whether you would have said this to Sister had she been in front of your face. My educated guess: No.
Apotheoun Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 (edited) I do wonder whether you would have said this to Sister had she been in front of your face. My educated guess: No. That would probably depend upon how he said it (i.e., his tone, inflections, and body language). Text messaging tends to be very impersonal. Edited July 30, 2013 by Apotheoun
Apotheoun Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 This thread is still open? :unsure: This seems to be a never-ending thread.
Selah Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 Todd, I should tell you that, for some reason, I always read your posts with a British accent. :|
Apotheoun Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 (edited) Todd, I should tell you that, for some reason, I always read your posts with a British accent. :| Interesting. I tend read my own posts in Mr. Spock's voice. :smile3: Although if you met me in person - and you can ask anyone on my Facebook friends list that I know personally to confirm this - you would find that I punctuate a lot of the things I say with humor (and especially a lot of sarcasm). Just ask any one of my former students. Edited July 30, 2013 by Apotheoun
BG45 Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 This thread is still open? :unsure: Three more pages...
tinytherese Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 And I never said couples should avoid having sex just because. ;) That said, it still doesn't establish a "right" to have sex for the spouses. This direction in the debate reminds me of NFP wars.
Recommended Posts