fides' Jack Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Most likely it is something that would not make it through the fiddler if spelled out. However, it also stands for India Development Alternatives Foundation, so I think we should just go with that. [mod]inconueniens lingua[/mod] Thanks - I probably would have guessed if it wasn't missing a "g". Please watch your language. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidei Defensor Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Canon 750 §2. Each and every thing which is proposed definitively by the magisterium of the Church concerning the doctrine of faith and morals, that is, each and every thing which is required to safeguard reverently and to expound faithfully the same deposit of faith, is also to be firm-ly embraced and retained; therefore, one who rejects those propositions which are to be held definitively is opposed to the doctrine of the Catholic Church. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrysostom Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Canon 750 §2. Each and every thing which is proposed definitively by the magisterium of the Church concerning the doctrine of faith and morals, that is, each and every thing which is required to safeguard reverently and to expound faithfully the same deposit of faith, is also to be firm-ly embraced and retained; therefore, one who rejects those propositions which are to be held definitively is opposed to the doctrine of the Catholic Church. Stop quoting Church teaching because it clearly shows that you think yourself less of a sinner than others! It's extremely insensitive, especially in Debate Table! !!!!!!!!11111!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credo in Deum Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Stop quoting Church teaching because it clearly shows that you think yourself less of a sinner than others! It's extremely insensitive, especially in Debate Table! !!!!!!!!11111!!!!!!!!! Am I the only one waiting for the "JK"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrysostom Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Am I the only one waiting for the "JK"? implicit, dude, implicit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BG45 Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Perhaps something everyone can agree on? In honor of his feast day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perigrina Posted June 26, 2014 Author Share Posted June 26, 2014 Church document quotes often come across as trying to prove to people that they are not Catholic. What I started the thread for was to help me to understand a way of thinking that is very foreign to me. When I started the thread I considered putting it somewhere other than Debate Table, but then I figured it would end up here anyhow so I might as well start it here. But now I am wondering if I made a mistake. Maybe I should have tried harder to make it be a thread about understanding people instead of a thread for proving people are wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidei Defensor Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Perhaps something everyone can agree on? In honor of his feast day. You win x 68275643642357 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidei Defensor Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Stop quoting Church teaching because it clearly shows that you think yourself less of a sinner than others! It's extremely insensitive, especially in Debate Table! !!!!!!!!11111!!!!!!!!! HEraTIC EVIL APOstatE! Let you be anathema! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidei Defensor Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 As I said before, it ultimately comes down to honesty. But I believe even canon law is clear that one cannot both oppose Catholic belief and at the same time be Catholic. I'm not saying that to be insensitive, but simply as a statement gathered from reading the canon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credo in Deum Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 implicit, dude, implicit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrysostom Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 implicit, dude, implicit. Americans want their humour with a flashing neon sign next to it saying "THIS IS HUMOR"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perigrina Posted June 26, 2014 Author Share Posted June 26, 2014 As I said before, it ultimately comes down to honesty. But I believe even canon law is clear that one cannot both oppose Catholic belief and at the same time be Catholic. I'm not saying that to be insensitive, but simply as a statement gathered from reading the canon. According to Catholic teaching Catholics must accept Catholic teaching. But the people who reject Catholic teaching reject the teaching about accepting Catholic teaching. Finding more evidence that Catholic teaching says that Catholics must accept Catholic teaching is not really going to do anything. (However, I may have invented a good tongue twister. Try saying it three times fast.) And it does not get me any closer to understanding why these people want to identify as Catholic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anomaly Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Church document quotes often come across as trying to prove to people that they are not Catholic. What I started the thread for was to help me to understand a way of thinking that is very foreign to me. When I started the thread I considered putting it somewhere other than Debate Table, but then I figured it would end up here anyhow so I might as well start it here. But now I am wondering if I made a mistake. Maybe I should have tried harder to make it be a thread about understanding people instead of a thread for proving people are wrong. Unless you're omnipotent and omniscient, you can't control or know how people are going to react. There has always been a wide range of posters on PM. There is never a sustained mature discussion for very long. It always devolves. Either with sarcasm, ponies, cheese, or indignant Butthurt. That's a given. Some posters act their age of twelve, and the rest of us occasionally act twelve as well. Occasionally being right is my super power that is always unappreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidei Defensor Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 According to Catholic teaching Catholics must accept Catholic teaching. But the people who reject Catholic teaching reject the teaching about accepting Catholic teaching. Finding more evidence that Catholic teaching says that Catholics must accept Catholic teaching is not really going to do anything. (However, I may have invented a good tongue twister. Try saying it three times fast.) And it does not get me any closer to understanding why these people want to identify as Catholic. True and understood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now