Guest Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 (edited) It ties together. Catlick has made racist post in the past. I'm not going to go search for them. One of them I remember was that it's okay for white business owners to only hire white people. There are other statements too. How it ties together with this is that most black people who identify as Christian aren't Catholic. So when you go saying a bunch of negative things about their faith n beliefs and you add the racist remarks she/he has said in the past it's not cool. If you can't see this or don't agree with me that's fine. I don't really care. I've seen racism my whole life. It started in 2nd grade when my black friend got called the n word repeatedly on the bus. I'm really over self righteous pharisee Catholics who want to take about all of the Black Christians and equate their faith in Christ to heresy. Why would black people even want to convert when a whole bunch of Catholics go on and on about how great the Confederate flag is. I believe the Catholic Church holds the full truth but thus kind of stuff tempts me to find a non denominational church where black and white people worship God together. Edited July 31, 2015 by Guest
KnightofChrist Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 Floop you, you racist jackhole mother flooper.
Catlick Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 It ties together. Catlick has made racist post in the past. I'm not going to go search for them. One of them I remember was that it's okay for white business owners to only hire black people. LOL, I've never said such a thing. Merely said that I believe that a business owner has the right to prefer a candidate of his own color to an equally skilled/educated/experienced candidate of a different color, for reasons of social cohesion. Seems to me as just the same as prefering a blonde to a brownhaired girl in case of equally nice personality.
Guest Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 That was supposed to say it's okay for a white business owner to only hire white people.
KnightofChrist Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 LOL, I've never said such a thing. Merely said that I believe that a business owner has the right to prefer a candidate of his own color to an equally skilled/educated/experienced candidate of a different color, for reasons of social cohesion. Seems to me as just the same as prefering a blonde to a brownhaired girl in case of equally nice personality. If you wanted to show you were not a racist after Credo in good will stuck out his neck for you a black face image is surely not the type of thing you would post. Unless of course you are racist.
Catlick Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 That was supposed to say it's okay for a white business owner to only hire white people. I'd say that a ginger business owner has the right to only hire gingers. The Jewish business owner to only hire Jews. The white business owner to only hire white people. That's called freedom. If you wanted to show you were not a racist after Credo in good will stuck out his neck for you a black face image is surely not the type of thing you would post. Unless of course you are racist. Chill, dude, it's a joke.
Credo in Deum Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 @Catlick, if you post images like that again, I really don't care if you did it to be humorous, I will give you an official warning.
KnightofChrist Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 Chill, dude, it's a joke. Yes, a racist bigoted so-called joke.
KnightofChrist Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 Since you just posted a black face image, I have to ask, who do the apes and monkeys in this picture represent Cat?
Catlick Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 I actually didn't spot the monkeys until I posted it.
Tab'le De'Bah-Rye Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 (edited) I kinda actually agree with catlick about white people being able to choose white people, jews to choose jews etc, as long as they aren't persecuting any others outside of there little club. And of course not all have to subscribe to such practice and those that disagree just don't go to the store. A catholic school should be allowed to employ only catholic teaches if it so wishes, though perhaps not refuse any patrons unless any patron displays unruly behavior and in such a case it should be well within the rights of an establishment to ban such a person. I may be totally wrong. Idk. The holy roman catholic church refuses anyone whom is not a baptised and confirmed member of the church holy communion. Is this a form of racism? Edited July 31, 2015 by Tab'le De'Bah-Rye
Nihil Obstat Posted July 31, 2015 Author Posted July 31, 2015 And again i wouldn't call anyone who isn't catholic a heretic, a heretic is a catholic whom has delibrately with full knowledge and consent and refusal to submit to magesterial justice continued to believe something that attacks the fundemental truths of the faith. This is incorrect. CCC: "Heresy is the obstinate post-baptismal denial of some truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or it is likewise an obstinate doubt concerning the same."Heresy then is denial of the truths of the faith. One can be an heretic by denying these truths even if he is not a Catholic to begin with.
Tab'le De'Bah-Rye Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 (edited) I believe you are incorrect Nihil, though perhaps my understanding is not complete my knowledge would come from the magesterium of the catholic church. I talk with a lot of priests and go to talks run by priests and bishops, i ask questions but don't question the holy magesterium. And again you proove me correct with church documents, the heretic needs to be have been baptised catholic. Edited July 31, 2015 by Tab'le De'Bah-Rye
Nihil Obstat Posted July 31, 2015 Author Posted July 31, 2015 I believe you are incorrect Nihil, though perhaps my understanding is not complete my knowledge would come from the magesterium of the catholic church. I talk with a lot of priests and go to talks run by priests and bishops, i ask questions but don't question. Your understanding is incorrect.
Tab'le De'Bah-Rye Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 Your understanding is incorrect. read my edit.
Nihil Obstat Posted July 31, 2015 Author Posted July 31, 2015 You are still incorrect. The definition is "post-baptismal denial".
Tab'le De'Bah-Rye Posted July 31, 2015 Posted July 31, 2015 (edited) The church is addressing catholics therefore is defining a baptism performed by one of her holy priesthood, not the world outside the church, the catechism is such a document, and infallible by the way. Though any outsiders who choose to believe that which the universal magesterium chooses to teach is most welcome to. Edited July 31, 2015 by Tab'le De'Bah-Rye
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now